Quote:
Originally Posted by slidekellyslide
Not for nothing, but the coffee lawsuit had some merit and it's not just my opinion..it is the opinion of many legal scholars. What gets reported in the press and the truth aren't always the same.
The facts: http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm |
The damning evidence against McDonalds was they actually did a business case analysis and decided that the money they would save by keeping the coffee hotter and therefore fresher longer would offset any legal losses they would incur because the coffee was too hot to drink. That didn't make the jury very happy.
And if anyone questions my inside information I will immediately sue Archive for liable and slather.