![]() |
1952 Topps Mantle
Posted By: <b>Mike Lentz</b><p>Good Or bad?<br><br><img src="http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/tt116/mikefeldman1/52toppsmantle2.jpg" alt="[linked image]"><br><br><img src="http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/tt116/mikefeldman1/52toppsmantle3.jpg" alt="[linked image]"><br><br><img src="http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/tt116/mikefeldman1/52toppsmantle4.jpg" alt="[linked image]"><br><br><img src="http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/tt116/mikefeldman1/52toppsmantle.jpg" alt="[linked image]">
|
1952 Topps Mantle
Posted By: <b>stefan</b><p>stay away from this card!
|
1952 Topps Mantle
Posted By: <b>Doug</b><p>Definitely fake.
|
1952 Topps Mantle
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Really bad.
|
1952 Topps Mantle
Posted By: <b>bbcemporium</b><p>Do you have any pictures of the back?
|
1952 Topps Mantle
Posted By: <b>Cat</b><p>Bad
|
1952 Topps Mantle
Posted By: <b>Steve Dawson</b><p>There is absolutely ZERO chance of this card being real. One tell-tale diagnostic gives it away as a completely obvious fake.<br><br><br>Steve
|
1952 Topps Mantle
Posted By: <b>John V</b><p>So far, it's unanimous this is a fake. I'm always fascinated by threads like these. But for those of us with far less experience, help us understand why you feel as you do. <br>My initial impression was the the very uniform rounded corners. None are fuzzy. Am I on the right track? What else?<br>Thanks, John
|
1952 Topps Mantle
Posted By: <b>Steve Dawson</b><p>The best thing I know to do is show a real 1952 Topps Mantle. There are two different variations of the card, and here's a real copy of this particular variation:<br><br>(Pay particular attention to the name box at the bottom of the card)<br><br><br>Steve<br><br><img src="http://i1.ebayimg.com/08/i/001/3a/8a/54af_1.JPG" alt="[linked image]">
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:47 PM. |