Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)

- Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)

- - You Grade Em (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=90487)

Posted By: Frank B I realize that a scan is not ideal but I would like to see what some of the experienced eyes would give these cards. I put them in alphabetical order. Thanks. <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1218069265.JPG"> <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1218069287.JPG"> <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1218069320.JPG"> <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1218069439.JPG">

Posted By: JasonI'll take a shot. Davis - SGC40 Overall - SGC30 Steinfeldt -SGC50 Wilson - SGC20

Posted By: Steve6 4 5 2 Steve

Posted By: Dave F 60 40 40 30

Posted By: Todd Schultz80,40,70,30

Posted By: Tom Boblitt40 40 40 40

Posted By: Marty OgelvieWow, the grades are all over the board...here is what I came up with just doing a quick glance;50 30 60 20 martyOgelvie <a href="http://www.nyyankeecards.com">New York Yankee cards</a>

Posted By: Bill60 Davis 40 Overall 60 Steinfeldt 30 Wilson

Posted By: Steve MurrayDavis - SGC84 Overall - SGC50 Steinfeldt -SGC60 Wilson - SGC30

Posted By: Mattdo they all have numeric grades? If so: 60 40 30 (two wrinkles top right corner) 30

Posted By: Chris6 3 5 2

Posted By: Adam5, 4, 4, 3

Posted By: Frank B Matt - none are Authentic if thats what you mean. They all have standard numeric grades.

Posted By: barrysloateDavis and Steindfeldt both 80 The other two 40 Of course if any has a light crease it's impossible to tell.

Posted By: Eric B60 40 70 30

Posted By: Anthony S.Got a sneaky feeling based on the way the question was posed, that the cards on the right either received the same grade or higher than their more aesthetically appealing counterparts on the left.

Posted By: Michael SteeleCould be something tricky going on here but... Davis SGC 70 Overall SGC 40 Steinfeldt SGC 50 Wilson SGC 40 Is there a prize if someone nails it....

Posted By: Judson HamlinI'll go with 60 on the Davis, 50 on Steinfeldt, 30 on Orvie and 20 on Wilson; I'm thinking that Davis look short, even though it's not an A

Posted By: cmokingFrom the scans alone, I'd say: Davis 80 - but not sure about the bottom left area. Overall 40 - top right, is that paper loss? If so, 30 Steinfeldt 80 Wilson 40

Posted By: LanceSteinfelt = T or 50/4 Wilson = 30/2 Overall = T or 40/3 Davis = T or 50/4

Posted By: fkw50, 30, 50, 20

Posted By: Craig WDavis - SGC60 Overall - SGC40 Steinfeldt -SGC50 Wilson - SGC30

Posted By: Rhett Yeakley60,40,50,40

Posted By: Alan UDavis - A Overall - 40 Steinfeldt -A Wilson - 40

Posted By: Tony Andrea 70 40 70 30

Posted By: Brian T.SGC 70 SGC 30 SGC 60 SGC 20

Posted By: Carl LamendolaYou need to answer two questions.... Any paper loss (front or back) on the nicer looking cards? Any creases and where?

Posted By: MikeUDavis: A or 70/5.5 Overall: 30/2 Steinfeldt: A or 50/4 Wilson: 20/1.5

Posted By: Bob50, 30, 50, 20 same as fkw

Posted By: Scott Mt. Joy80 40 70 30

Posted By: Frank B Thanks to all who graded. I asked because when going through some cards and sorting by grade several did not look right especially when lined up vs other cards a grade or two higher or lower. I pulled some I thought I should crack out and send back in and Davis and Steinfeldt were two of them. I examined them under magnification and Davis has no issues. Steinfeldt has a wrinkle bottom right hand corner but it's tough to see with the naked eye. I put Overall and Wilson in as pretty represenative of their grade although it does look like Wilson is a bit overgraded. I think the grades given thus far are not going to change a whole lot if we keep going so here are the results of the poll: DAVIS - avg grade SGC60/5.0 OVERALL - avg grade SGC 40/3.0 STEINFELDT - avg grade SGC50+/4.4 WILSON - avg grade SGC30+/2.1 The consensus was Overall got exactly what he deserved and that Wilson received a break. Not one person thought Steinfeldt or Davis deserved the low grade SGC gave it and almost all thought it wasn't even close. Noone graded Wilson better than any of the other three and noone gave Overall a higher mark than Davis or Steinfeldt. Across the board it was felt that Davis and Steinfelt were the superior cards. That's what I thought as well and I'll be sending them in raw somewhere for a new grade. I'll put the new grades up when I get them back. The actual grades given by SGC were: DAVIS - 20/1.5 OVERALL - 40/3 STEINFELDT - 20/1.5 WILSON - 40/3 <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1218077501.JPG"> <img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1218077822.JPG">

Posted By: cmokingWow! Is it possible there are marks on the two SGC 20s that are hard to see via scan?

Posted By: Frank B The Davis has a dent on reverse above the O in "Piedmont" and another little ding dead center at the very top. Other than that he looks pretty clean. Steinfeldt has a tough to see wrinkle on his free hand and a little something going on with the SE in "Series" on the reverse. Otherwise, nothing I can point to. We're talking pretty minor stuff on both but that's what my untrained eye saw when I looked for problems. They are clearly undergraded and it would be really tough to say those other two that received twice the grade are comparable cards when viewed side by side.