![]() |
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>George H. Counter</b><p>David Rudd, with all due respect, is it necessary to edit every single post you write multiple times?<br /><br />I think you are a good contributor to the board, but in my opinion, this is simply ridiculous.<br /><br />Is there a rational explanation for editing a 5-10 line post more than 15 times in an hour period?<br /><br />I know some people just don't give a darn about it, just as I did before having to scroll down the strange 19th century photograph discussion thread.<br /><br />Wonder if you could explain your editing reasons every single time you make one.<br />
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>Why not email this to him?
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>paulstratton</b><p>I don't see why it bothers you so much. Maybe he is a perfectionist...
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Dan Bretta</b><p>It is only bothersome to me when I have made a response and 10 minutes later that response makes no sense because he has completely re-written his post. Other than that I could care less and sometimes I even get a chuckle from seeing a post edited 10 times in an hour.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Peter_Spaeth</b><p>That the complaint comes from a person named Counter?
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Frank Wakefield</b><p>Could George be waiting for David to respond, so George could then drastically edit his post so these responses seem meaningless?
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>paulstratton</b><p>Don't take it personally Dan.<img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> I don't see him participate much in the controversial topics, mostly informational, so I don't see it as a big deal.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>dennis</b><p> give him a break,he just hasn't found the preview/edit option yet.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>quan</b><p>i enjoy david's editings, i think he's been on n54 since day one...one of a few early members that still post regularly. kinda like a blast from the past ala a surviving player from the t206 era <br /><br /><br />edit: if u don't like dr. cycleback's edits, ur not a true n54 member <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Alan</b><p>This message board just cracks me up. I can't stop laughing...<br /><br /><img src="http://vbbc.forumotion.com/users/17/23/61/smiles/136179.gif">
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Steve</b><p>Please, show some compassion. David has this rare condition, Typing Tourette's Syndrome, or TTS.<br /><br /><br />I was lucky enough to catch a screenshot long ago, "f*ck Albumen f*ckk assmunchadick Daguerreotype bjiusnoubhosoijbno sh!tty Photogravure sh!tty poo poo..." <br /><br />Trust me, You WANT those edits!<br /><br />
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Tom Boblitt</b><p>is the 'Vile Weed' Broccoli avatar from the Seinfeld episode with Kenny Rogers chicken?<br /><br />I wonder about David's editing habits but, ultimately, other than just a bit odd, what's the big deal. God knows, it's the ONLY odd thing around here, huh?<br /><br /><br />
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Joe D.</b><p>I for one enjoy David's posts, am grateful for the knowledge he shares, and do not mind the edits one bit.<br /><br />
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Steve</b><p>Tom, you nailed it! Haha, Didn't take long. On a related but somber note. The missus has decided after nearly 17 years of Seinfeld, every night, it is time to move on*. She says, "I don't even need to use the volume cuz you recite all the lines." I guess I'm no low-talker <br /><br /><br />*I am still permitted, however, to watch when on nightshift at the station.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Steve- I get to watch two Seinfelds and one Curb Your Enthusiasm per night without any grief from my wife...although she does think I watch too much TV in general.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>jeffdrum</b><p>He's the PENULTIMATE editor.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Jason L</b><p>at a post on this Board in quite some time.<br />Truly,....thank you.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Julie Vognar</b><p>why complain about the kind of editing he hs to do to produce it?<img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/jphotos/042502_2178_1220_prv.gif">
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Scot Reader</b><p>Nobody should have to justify his or her editing practices.<br /><br />Perhaps George should have self-edited before initiating this thread.<br /><br />Edited to add: The Rockies are down 8-0 in the first inning, which is why I am in such a crappy mood.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Mark Evans</b><p>Welcome back. Mark
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Paul</b><p>Today's my 47th birthday, & my wife bought me the Seinfeld box set (all nine seasons) !<br /><br />edited to add that I frequently use the edit function too. I'm very sleep deprived, & a perfectionist. That's a bad combination. Also, I think David's cycleback website is a great resource. Thank you!<br /><br />
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Marty Ogelvie</b><p>Personally, I am too lazy to edit. Unless it is an ERROR that can not easily be discerned.<br><br>martyOgelvie<br /><a href="http://www.nyyankeecards.com">New York Yankee cards</a>
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>quan</b><p>scot r...9-0 dodgers, kemp with 2 doubles and i'm loving it <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Alan</b><p>Julie -<br /><br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8Qyv3XCLI4" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W8Qyv3XCLI4</a>
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>Happy B'day Paul.....You are a about 45 days older than I am....You old man....<br />I don't mind David's edits as he contributes more than most others for the good of the board and, though we have never met, seems like a nice guy <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>. Such triviality.....<br /><br />edited to be apropos and to say that I do see the point about changing the context and then other posts seem out of place...I think that rarely happens.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Anthony S.</b><p>I've always marveled at the Dorskind Group's spectacular restraint in editing. It's as if they all agree upon exactly what to say the first time around.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>robert a</b><p>I'm more annoyed by this thread.<br />David's a good guy who cares about the content he puts out there.<br /><br />Rob<br /><br /><br />Edited in Honor of David<br />Edited again<br />Edited
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Kevin Cummings</b><p>It must be a slow night if someone needs to take David Rudd to task for his tendency to edit his posts multiple times. David has been around since the days of the Full Count board, so relative newbies should cut him some slack for that alone.<br /><br />To be honest, I'd rather read a post that has been edited multiple times and actually makes sense than read one that has never been edited and makes none.<br /><br />P.S. David - this heartfelt support has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that your father wrote some textbooks for my employer and indirectly paid my salary for a time! <img src="/images/wink.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Scot Reader</b><p><<To be honest, I'd rather read a post that has been edited multiple times and actually makes sense than read one that has never been edited and makes none.>><br /><br />Kevin--My sentiments exactly.<br /><br /><<scot r...9-0 dodgers, kemp with 2 doubles and i'm loving it>><br /><br />Quan--Now 11-1 Bums. At least it's a three game set.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Dave F</b><p><br />This was a completely ridicilious thread to have initiated. David Rudd is one of the most knowledgeable people in this hobby, especially when it comes to vintage photos, etc and in spotting fakes. I know he has helped me out a few times in that regards.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Paul</b><p>Thanks Leon <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Steve Murray</b><p>Edit out meaningful thoughtful post to original post.<br /><br />Replace with: Who gives a toot? <br />
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>B D</b><p>about cards with pink covers is cool!<br />David is cool,the books are cool,his posts are cool!<br />the editing is cool!<br />good work D.R.<br /><br />how is Scott Forrest doing?<br><br>BcD <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Burgher</b><p>David thanks for all the advice/information that you given me over the last five+ years.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Hi Julie- How have you been? Didn't know you still read the board. Hope you continue to post.<br /><br />Paul- Happy birthday (mine's coming up in a couple of weeks and I will be an ancient 56). I've never seen the Seinfeld boxed sets but I hear they are good for outtakes.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>andy becker</b><p>if everyone contributed to this board the way DR does, this would be a much, much, much better place. David has a tremendous amount of knowledge that he shares readily.<br /><br />
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Burgher</b><p>Nice Andy!
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>peter ullman</b><p>wow...I'm sure glad no one can see me picking my nose while I scan my cards!
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>David is a really good guy who spends a lot of time on the board contributing interesting and informative posts. While his multiple edits are a curiosity, he didn't need to be taken to task over it.<br /><br />But I'm surprised he hasn't responded on this thread. I guess he prefers not to, which I understand.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Mark C.</b><p>Does this mean that the original variations of his posts are more valuable; and could it be that he's introducing errors into the market to drive up the price?<br />
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Al C.risafulli</b><p>Amazing.<br /><br />In the interest of full disclosure, I overuse the phrase "it is what it is," I sometimes use a semicolon where a comma would suffice and I occasionally put the comma outside the quotes.<br /><br />I apologize in advance and hope you can still slog your way through my posts.<br /><br />-Al
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Jim VB</b><p>Al,<br /><br />I hear you. I never know whether the period goes inside or outside the parenthesis at the end of a sentence (something I do a lot of.). ???<br /><br /><br />I always try to remember that a preposition is a bad word to end a sentence with!<br /><br /><br />I always enjoy David's posts. I don't care how many times he edits them.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Max Weder</b><p>Jim<br /><br />Isn't the saying "Ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I shall not put" , (supposedly Winston Churchill)<br /><br />I find that ending sentences with propositions creates more difficulties.<br /><br />Max
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Steve</b><p>I always enjoy David's posts. I don't care how many times he edits them.<br /><br /><br /><br />Yup<br /><br /><br />Steve
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Tim Newcomb</b><p>One sentence, five prepositions (lore from my wife's family):<br /><br />"Daddy, what did you bring that book I didn't want to be read to out of up for?"<br /><br />
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>barrysloate</b><p>Tim- that sentence appears to be grammatically correct but so convoluted that it would clearly need to be changed.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Bryan Long</b><p>Any post that brings Julie back to the board must be a good one. Good to hear from you again. My opinion is that David brings a ton to this board. And the information that he brings is substantial. I will overlook edits.<br><br>.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>davidcycleback</b><p>At a dinner party a woman said to Winston Churchill, "If you were were my husband, I'd put poison in your tea." To which Churchill replied, "And if you were my wife, I'd drink it."<br /><br />I'm aware I use the edit function more than others. I have the habit of reading and fixing my posts (rewriting, adding, subtracting, etc). I'm concerned about the final text, not the line of editing denotations that follow a post. It's an admirable habit for a writer, just obvious on a chat board that marks you're edits. If the edit function wasn't there, I wouldn't (and couldn't) use it. <br /><br />People have commented and joked about my editing, but no one's complained to me about it. I have probably commented and joked about it.<br /><br />Most people's comments and jokes are not about the editing-- which I think they mostly could care less about-- but the line of edit marks. As this is an aesthetic issue, I am aware of the issue but take it with due seriousness-- which means I don't take it too serious. <br /><br />George's initial post was respectful and sincere, so I consider it as fair criticism or comment.
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Marty Ogelvie</b><p><P>David,</P><P>I enjoyed the Churchill note but I didn't understand a word after that... perhaps more editing is required...</P><br><br>martyOgelvie<br /><a href="http://www.nyyankeecards.com">New York Yankee cards</a>
|
David Rudd's message editing behavior
Posted By: <b>Jodi Birkholm</b><p>Churchill was one sharp-witted man. I really wish I could have hoisted a few pints alongside him. <br /><br />His best quip is quoted all the time. At yet another party, a lady walked up to Sir Winston and said, "Mr. Churchill, you're DRUNK!". Not missing a beat, Churchill said, "And you, madam, are ugly. The difference is, when I wake up tomorrow, I will be sober!". Perhaps the best comeback ever.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:14 AM. |