Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Right or Wrong (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=89820)

Archive 05-27-2008 12:12 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Bobby Binder</b><p>I have been seeing a lot of auctions on eBay by Beckettmedia and GAI has Global Passport. Am I wrong in thinking that this is a serious conflict of interest? Should grading companies be able to grade a card then sell it? To me this is wrong and they should not be in the business of selling cards.

Archive 05-27-2008 12:13 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Cobby33</b><p>I don't think it's a conflict if and only if they card came into their possession, for them to sell, after already being graded.

Archive 05-27-2008 12:14 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Matt</b><p>Didn't Beckett acknowledge this issue when they decided to use REA to auction the T206 Wagner instead of their own auction system?

Archive 05-27-2008 12:25 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Bobby Binder</b><p>How would you ever know if the card was given to them already graded? We are suppose to trust them that they did not give themselves the grade "BUMP' you hear about everywhere? Just seems to me they would be better served if they just sold it through a service that specializes in eBay sales like Just Collect for one.

Archive 05-27-2008 12:33 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Mark Lutz</b><p>In principle, a grading company could grade and sell cards without violating any moral codes or laws. They would be judged according to the quality of their grading and customer service. Of course there will be lots of room for error and duplicity. Myself, I had a bad experience last year with Globalpassport, whose customer service was horrendous. They put the wrong address on my cards and would not respond to my phone calls or emails begging for help. When I eventually tracked the cards down on my own, I found that the grading was a little generous, too.

Archive 05-27-2008 05:44 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Cobby33</b><p>"How would you ever know if the card was given to them already graded? We are suppose to trust them that they did not give themselves the grade "BUMP' you hear about everywhere? Just seems to me they would be better served if they just sold it through a service that specializes in eBay sales like Just Collect for one."<br /><br />I guess rely on their disclosures and take their word for it. On higher-profile cards such as the Gretzky Wagner (for example)- it would be clear whether that was re-graded or not.

Archive 05-27-2008 06:17 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Dave Hornish</b><p>Huge conflict of interest IMHO. Huge.

Archive 05-27-2008 06:27 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Eric B</b><p>There's a reason why it's called "third-party" grading.<br /><br />Imaprtiality is crucial. Accounting auditors are not allowed to own stock in any company the firm audits. You lose trust, you go out of business - see Arthur Anderson.

Archive 05-27-2008 06:44 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Tim</b><p>If the grade a card receives directly effects the sellers bottom line and the grader and seller are one in the same, you can't expect the grading to be completely impartial.<br /><br />Granted if the grading were grossly inconsistent the market would have a backlash against the company in question. But with grading being as subjective as it is, the grey areas and grade bumps can become more one sided when profit is involved.<br />

Archive 05-28-2008 09:49 AM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Rob</b><p>i thought beckett graded the recent T206 find pretty fairly, but it was auctioned in REA. seems like they are just trying to sell it themselves instead of going through a 3rd party auction house - thus not paying consignment fees.<br /><br />but i can see where some skepticism would exist. if they overgrade, they will shoot themselves in the foot.<br /><br />Rob<br /><img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive 05-28-2008 10:09 AM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>JimB</b><p>ENORMOUS conflict of interest. It is shocking to me that a "third-party" grading company would even consider it, much less that anyone would bid in these auctions. They are no longer "third-party" when they start doing it. Did they forget the whole point of what they are doing to begin with?<br />JimB

Archive 05-28-2008 11:52 AM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>DD</b><p>How about the fact that Dave Forman's brother Steve is an SGC authorized dealer?

Archive 05-28-2008 12:05 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Bobby Binder</b><p>Nothing wrong with a little nepotism we all do it don't we for the most part.

Archive 05-28-2008 01:50 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Mark Holt</b><p>I also believe it's a huge conflict of interest.

Archive 05-28-2008 01:59 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Bruce Babcock</b><p>Alan Hager used to grade the cards (ASA), publish a price guide to tell you what his graded cards were worth, and then hold his own auctions, with very high estimates as to what the lots would go for.<br /><br />A huge conflict of interest.<br /><br />The marketplace took care of him. However, sometimes the just the appearance of impropriety is enough to keep bidders away.

Archive 05-28-2008 02:06 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Rob</b><p>"How about the fact that Dave Forman's brother Steve is an SGC authorized dealer?"<br /><br />DD, thats fine cuz its SGC.<br /><br />Rob<br /><img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Archive 05-28-2008 04:07 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>Joe D.</b><p>It is about as conflicted as an interest could get.

Archive 05-28-2008 07:32 PM

Right or Wrong
 
Posted By: <b>MikeU</b><p>Auction companies are receiving way too much grief in today's market. <br /><br />Never get cheated, <br /><br />MikeU


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:19 PM.