![]() |
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>Addie_Joss</b><p><a href="http://www.sportscardlink.com/itemdetail.asp?back=%2Fsubsection%2Easp%3Fid%3D836 7&id=702942" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.sportscardlink.com/itemdetail.asp?back=%2Fsubsection%2Easp%3Fid%3D836 7&id=702942</a><br /><br />Don't know much about hyper linking but check it out. Its an auction from Sports Card Link. Look how rough the left border is.
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>Zinn</b><p>I've often noticed that with Mayo the grading companies are somewhat lenient with the condition of the the black borders.<br /><br />With that said, it is hard to understand how it could be an 8.
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>Fred C</b><p>As far as grading goes there shouldn't be a difference between the way the grading company views an N300 (black border) and 1971 Topps (black borders). If that was a 1971 Topps then that card might grade a "6". Inconsistencies in grading really stink. The grading companies need to stick to one standard, not one standard for vintage and another standard for more recent issues.
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>MVSNYC</b><p>think about this...<br /><br />what if you have a T206 card with similar edges and corners as this Mayo...with the white borders on the T206, it is LESS noticable and would probably grade an "8"...here, you use the same grading standards, but with the black edges, it's more noticable...<br /><br />do you knock it down a grade just becasue it is more noticable in black?...is it still an "8"?<br /><br />something to think about.<br /><br />
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>Addie_Joss</b><p>Looks to me as thought the card should be given a 5. That rough border is a major issue and a card with an 8 should be visually flawless with minor superficial defects visible only under magnification.
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>JimB</b><p>Incredible card. Michael makes a good point. Maybe it should be 7.<br />JimB
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>Harry Wallace (HW)</b><p>No sure if it is a strict NM-MT, but that is the nicest Mayo card that I have ever seen. I do agree that it seems as though both PSA and SGC give Mayo cards the benefit of the doubt.<br /><br /><br /><br />
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>Todd Schultz</b><p>I really have no problem with the grade, and I have seen some '71 Topps PSA 8s that had that look on an edge or two. More importantly, that card will be bought or not on the basis of its visual appeal, grade be damned. It's not like there are alot of collectors out there looking to upgrade their Mayo 7s who will just buy the slab.
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>Steve</b><p>Sometimes they will allow for a factory rough cut. Is that the case here?<br /><br />I am not into the nuances of this set. However many sets up and including the <br /><br />80's OPC have this.<br /><br />I have many early 50's cards with the rough cut.<br /><br /><br /><br />Steve
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>Denny Walsh</b><p>The "Diamond Cut" Kills this Card! Add the edge issue and I see a "5"....imho<br />Very Nice Card though....but $21,000.00...ahhh ~ No!<br /><br />Life's Grand,<br />Denny Walsh
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>Steve</b><p>I agree the rough cut is one thing (if it is fact that) the diamond cut should have added the MC<br />to any numerical grade. They blew it on that one that is for sure.<br /><br /><br />Steve
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>David Seaborn</b><p>The Mayos are by far my favorite set I've ever completed. There are a lot of little things that make collecting it interesting. Many, many of the cards have this same cut with a rough left edge and a very smooth right edge. Therefore, the cut doesn't bother me that much (the grade is another matter). I remember this card being auctioned in late 2005 and what bothered me was what appeared to be the reminants of some glue or other adhesive on the back. Check out the back scan, towards the bottom...you can still make it out. With that said, it's still an amazing card. For those of you who think SGC gives a free pass on Mayos, I've submitted well over 100 over the years and I beg to differ. The black borders are unforgiving and SGC usually hammers you (part of the challenge of the set). I'll see if I can post some examples soon...
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>David Seaborn</b><p>Tell me again that SGC doesn't undergo very thorough scrutinizing with the Mayos...<br /><br /><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1206158158.JPG"> <br /><img src="http://www.network54.com/Realm/tmp/1206158200.JPG">
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>Harry Wallace (HW)</b><p>Based on your photos, I think that SGC is very inconsistent with their grades. What do the back of those cards look like?<br /><br />Look at this SGC graded VG example:<br /><br /><img src="http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r130/harryawallace/N300Delahanty.jpg">
|
How Did This Card Get Graded An 8?
Posted By: <b>Steve</b><p>All the grading companies miss one now and again. PSA misses the most because they grade the most.<br /><br />Even with all the crap that happens, the hobby is still better off now then it was in the 80's before grading.<br /><br />The above card looks to me like a 1.5 so it appears SGC dropped the ball .........on that one at least.<br /><br /><br />Steve
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:34 PM. |