Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=88670)

Archive 02-10-2008 07:43 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Pete Z.</b><p>Can you guess why?<br /><img src="http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a47/zouraspm/scandsf0003.jpg"><br /><img src="http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a47/zouraspm/scanasd0004.jpg"><br />Thanks,<br />Pete<br />

Archive 02-10-2008 07:49 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Jeff Shepherd</b><p>It's not a refractor?

Archive 02-10-2008 07:52 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Addie_Joss</b><p>reprint

Archive 02-10-2008 08:57 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Anthony N.</b><p>I still trying to guess why anything vintage would be sent to Beckett.

Archive 02-10-2008 09:18 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Phil Garry</b><p>Bottom right-hand corner on the front looks like black color may have been added.

Archive 02-10-2008 10:12 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Danny</b><p>its not a refractor... i got a kick out of that. so true.

Archive 02-10-2008 11:12 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>fkw</b><p>Beckett? Why?

Archive 02-10-2008 11:15 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Steve Murray</b><p>Because it's politically incorrect?

Archive 02-10-2008 11:21 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Steve Murray</b><p>Because of the erasures over the word (Baseball) on the reverse?

Archive 02-10-2008 11:30 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Addie_Joss</b><p>Why do you guys knock Beckett Grading so much?

Archive 02-10-2008 11:31 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Steve Murray</b><p>No knock, but for vintage SGC is a better alternative.

Archive 02-10-2008 11:36 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Addie_Joss</b><p>I definitely agree that if I could choose I'd pick SGC over Beckett but I don't think Beckett is a joke like say CSA or PRO. The only reason my vintage cards are graded by Beckett is that they come to the White Plains shows usually every time I'm there. I just can't bare to send my cards through the mail or else I'd always choose SGC.

Archive 02-10-2008 11:57 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>quan</b><p>don't know why i'm inviting more competition but beckett is a fine grader if you know what to look for. i've had a few and am/was happy with all of them...e101 cobb 3, e94 crawford 3, e98 walsh 4, t206 joss 4.5...all prewar vintage.

Archive 02-10-2008 12:00 PM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>dennis</b><p>looks to be deserving of the grade of good? they did not have a holder for it?

Archive 02-11-2008 09:21 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Paul S</b><p><br />Because James Haas wants it back with a 10?

Archive 02-13-2008 10:03 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Steve Murray</b><p>you have left us waiting long enough...WHY didn't GAI give it a # grade????

Archive 02-13-2008 10:18 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Alan U</b><p>It's too authentic or it hasn't been trimmed properly

Archive 02-13-2008 11:06 AM

Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
 
Posted By: <b>Pete Z.</b><p>I’m getting this second hand from my friend who submitted it, but he said they believed there was glue that was removed on the back of the card (unfair I know, fat chance seeing that in a scan). I thought it was the touch up job in the lower right corner on the front, but he said they didn’t mention that (and that they usually mention all alterations, not just one that would give it the altered designation). So it’s now on its way to SGC to either get into a number or AUTH slab. I’ll report back on the outcome. <br /><br />


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 PM.