![]() |
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Pete Z.</b><p>Can you guess why?<br /><img src="http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a47/zouraspm/scandsf0003.jpg"><br /><img src="http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a47/zouraspm/scanasd0004.jpg"><br />Thanks,<br />Pete<br />
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Jeff Shepherd</b><p>It's not a refractor?
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Addie_Joss</b><p>reprint
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Anthony N.</b><p>I still trying to guess why anything vintage would be sent to Beckett.
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Phil Garry</b><p>Bottom right-hand corner on the front looks like black color may have been added.
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Danny</b><p>its not a refractor... i got a kick out of that. so true.
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>fkw</b><p>Beckett? Why?
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Steve Murray</b><p>Because it's politically incorrect?
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Steve Murray</b><p>Because of the erasures over the word (Baseball) on the reverse?
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Addie_Joss</b><p>Why do you guys knock Beckett Grading so much?
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Steve Murray</b><p>No knock, but for vintage SGC is a better alternative.
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Addie_Joss</b><p>I definitely agree that if I could choose I'd pick SGC over Beckett but I don't think Beckett is a joke like say CSA or PRO. The only reason my vintage cards are graded by Beckett is that they come to the White Plains shows usually every time I'm there. I just can't bare to send my cards through the mail or else I'd always choose SGC.
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>quan</b><p>don't know why i'm inviting more competition but beckett is a fine grader if you know what to look for. i've had a few and am/was happy with all of them...e101 cobb 3, e94 crawford 3, e98 walsh 4, t206 joss 4.5...all prewar vintage.
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>dennis</b><p>looks to be deserving of the grade of good? they did not have a holder for it?
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Paul S</b><p><br />Because James Haas wants it back with a 10?
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Steve Murray</b><p>you have left us waiting long enough...WHY didn't GAI give it a # grade????
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Alan U</b><p>It's too authentic or it hasn't been trimmed properly
|
Beckett wouldn't give this card a # grade
Posted By: <b>Pete Z.</b><p>I’m getting this second hand from my friend who submitted it, but he said they believed there was glue that was removed on the back of the card (unfair I know, fat chance seeing that in a scan). I thought it was the touch up job in the lower right corner on the front, but he said they didn’t mention that (and that they usually mention all alterations, not just one that would give it the altered designation). So it’s now on its way to SGC to either get into a number or AUTH slab. I’ll report back on the outcome. <br /><br />
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 PM. |