i want this !!
 

Posted By: <b>jP</b><p>but not likely way outta my league.<br /><br /><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/Chick-GANDIL-White-Sox-C46-Montreal-PSA-4-ROOKIE-RC-W-W_W0QQitemZ190054696400QQihZ009QQcategoryZ31718QQs sPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/Chick-GANDIL-White-Sox-C46-Montreal-PSA-4-ROOKIE-RC-W-W_W0QQitemZ190054696400QQihZ009QQcategoryZ31718QQs sPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem</a><br><br>my collection: <a href="http://s102.photobucket.com/albums/m95/obaks/" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://s102.photobucket.com/albums/m95/obaks/</a>

i want this !!
 

Posted By: <b>steve f</b><p>It's a beaut, but wouldn't the T206 be the r/c?

i want this !!
 

Posted By: <b>dstudeba</b><p>The 1909 Obak also predates this. I am not sure if Obaks can be considered rookie cards since I don't keep up on the current rookie card definitions.

i want this !!
 

Posted By: <b>warshawlaw</b><p>With the proviso that I think this rookie stuff is BS if a guy has a bunch of earlier minor league cards, the C46 Gandil does not fit the rookie definition as popularly understood for at least three reasons: (1) It is not part of a nationally issued set, or even a regionally issued set since it was issued internationally, (2) It is not a major league cards, and (3) It is later than his PCL issue.<br /><br />Still a very nice card.

i want this !!
 

Posted By: <b>Mike</b><p>I have this card in a 3. I've had it so long, I couldn't remember what grade it was. Nice card, but it is not his rookie card. One would have to really stretch the definition of what defines a rookie card. This ain't it.. I can't wait to see what this goes for. I paid $60.00 for mine about 11 years ago. <br /><br />