For Discussion: Relative Values of T206 and T205
 

Posted By: <b>Chuck</b><p>Based on my limited knowledge of the market, it looks like oldcardboard.com is off the mark when they show T205 commons worth twice that of T206.<br /><br />Whaddayathink a fair relative value (same condition) is particularly towards the bottom of the spectrum (G-VG) if that makes a difference?<br /><br />I'd also be interested in relative values of T206 commons vs T206 Southern Leaguers.

For Discussion: Relative Values of T206 and T205
 

Posted By: <b>jay behrens</b><p>That used to be the case, but I've switched to t205s because I can get better looking t205 that t206s for the same price. Beat to crap t206s are going for $15. I can get a decent t205 with one or two minor creases for the same price and I've gotten a few crease free t205s for $20-25.<br /><br />Jay<br><br>Growing old is not optional, growing up is.

For Discussion: Relative Values of T206 and T205
 

Posted By: <b>Chuck</b><p>Would you say it's gone from 2:1 in favor of T205 (as oldcardboard indicates) to 1:2?

For Discussion: Relative Values of T206 and T205
 

Posted By: <b>Scot Reader</b><p><br />Chuck,<br /><br />T206 commons:T206 southern leaguers = about 1:3 pricewise.<br /><br />Used to be about 1:2 or 1:2.5 but southern leaguer prices have outpaced common prices recently--which is no small feat given the rise in common prices.