Is the T206 Estimator this Outdated?
 

Posted By: <b>joe brennan</b><p> Estimator "estimates" this card at $330. I think I better go back to 1990 Topps. UGH !<br /><br /><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/1909-T206-T-206-Carl-Lundgren-Chicago-PSA-5-Super-Sharp_W0QQitemZ8793219726QQcategoryZ31718QQrdZ1QQc mdZViewItem" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/1909-T206-T-206-Carl-Lundgren-Chicago-PSA-5-Super-Sharp_W0QQitemZ8793219726QQcategoryZ31718QQrdZ1QQc mdZViewItem</a><br /><br><br>A scared man can't gamble and a jealous man can't work.

Is the T206 Estimator this Outdated?
 

Posted By: <b>Trae R.</b><p>It depends on which you are referring to, there are multiple estimators now. If you arereferring to mine (mlbvintage.com) I am going to say yes, it's probably incorrect. I haven't the time or knowledge to maintain it to be accurate. A little birdy just swooped through my office and whispered into my ear that a new resource will be launching soon that should cover your needs most accurately. <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>

Is the T206 Estimator this Outdated?
 

Posted By: <b>Josh K.</b><p>Trae - <br /><br />Do elaborate please.

Is the T206 Estimator this Outdated?
 

Posted By: <b>Scot Reader</b><p><br />First, let me say that I think the T206 value estimator is a useful tool. That said, Lundgren (Chicago) is one of a handful of subjects that almost always shows up in lower grade and, as a consequence, will always command a greater multiple than other subjects when seen in high grade. Lundgren (Chicago) thus exposes a general weakness of computer-based estimators that simply assign a "condition multiple" to a base price to achieve a fair market value. Scot