hmmmmmmmm... Should be 8?
 

Posted By: <b>Henry Eshelman</b><p><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/1909-T206-JIM-STEPHENS-GRADED-PSA-2-should-be-8_W0QQitemZ8755622043QQcategoryZ31718QQssPageNameZ WDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://cgi.ebay.com/1909-T206-JIM-STEPHENS-GRADED-PSA-2-should-be-8_W0QQitemZ8755622043QQcategoryZ31718QQssPageNameZ WDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem</a><br /><br />This is pretty absurd. Could there be something the seller is not telling us about the back of the card?<br><br>Thanks, Henry Eshelman<br /><br />Website:www.freewebs.com/vintagebaseball

hmmmmmmmm... Should be 8?
 

Posted By: <b>Joe Jones</b><p>Maybe a PRO 8

hmmmmmmmm... Should be 8?
 

Posted By: <b>Chris Mc</b><p>I e-mailed the seller and had a quick reply stating no back damage or paper loss. The scan isn't the greatest but, might be worth a bid if it stays low.

hmmmmmmmm... Should be 8?
 

Posted By: <b>JimB</b><p>Maybe their examination of the card was from the scan, which make it impossible to know.<br />JimB

hmmmmmmmm... Should be 8?
 

Posted By: <b>pete</b><p>creases all over the place and thats why the picture is at an angle....