Question about Sam Crawford Zeenut
 

Posted By: <b>Adam J. Baxter</b><p><br />I was reading a copy of Sports West (A West Coast hobby publication) from Fall '77 last night and came across a picture of a 1918 Zeenut ID'ed as HOFer Sam Crawford. There is also a photo of another 1918 Zeenut ID'ed as Sam Crawford on the PCL 100 website. The 2005 Standard Catalog only lists Crawford having a premium value in the 1921 set. He's listed as a common for 1918. Is this an error in the SCD book or are the Crawford's pictured in Sports West/PCL 100 misidentified?<br /><br />Best,<br /> Adam

Question about Sam Crawford Zeenut
 

Posted By: <b>jay behrens</b><p>My list of Major Leaguers that appeared on Zeenuts that was published in The Old Judge shows Sam Crawford being all 3 sets. It could be that 1921 is a tougher set. Mark Macrae or some other Zeenut guru would be better able to answer why the price difference exists.<br /><br />Jay<br><br>Suppose you are an idiot...then suppose you are the President. Oh, wait. I'm repeating myself.

Question about Sam Crawford Zeenut
 

Posted By: <b>brian p</b><p>A card for Sam Crawford, playing for the LA team, exists in the 1918, 1920, and 1921 Zeenut sets. It is an oversight if listed as a common in the SCD guide.<br /><br />Brian