![]() |
We won't grade :-(
Posted By: <b>tbob</b><p>Nice cards which for one reason or another won't grade is this thread. Grant has a tiny recoloring, Mott, as were so many 1909 Obaks, was hand cut from the original sheet, Chance has a irregular left edge cut and Young was returned as trimmed although it appears to measure correctly.<br />Shame, but still the cards have a place in ye olde safe...<br /><img src="http://www.members.aol.com/trophybob/nograde.jpg"><br /><br /><br />
|
We won't grade :-(
Posted By: <b>tbob</b><p>Spotty scans. Sheesh...
|
We won't grade :-(
Posted By: <b>UncleJohn</b><p>.......adds that lovely checkerboard.<br />I always wondered ..is it the cheapo scanner or lack of good image software.<br /><br /><br />btw, nice cards<br /><br />forget the slabs, save room in your safe <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14>
|
We won't grade :-(
Posted By: <b>jack goodman</b><p>that if you go into your photo software and use the "blur" tool, it cleans up the spots and makes the picture look like it should. Hope this helps.
|
We won't grade :-(
Posted By: <b>petecld</b><p>That isn't caused by a cheap scanner. That effect is caused by the dot pattern used to print the cards. All scanners will pick it up. In your scanning program look for a option called "descreen" or "descreening". If you get an option asking you to pick a "DPI" or a "LPI" use 85 for anewspaper photo, 110 or 133 for magazines or cards. You'll notice it'll take a little longer to do a scan but it should rid you of that problem. <br /><br />Yes, you can you the "blur" tool to get rid of it but then you have a blurry image. I suggest one use the despeckle filter to lessen this problem.
|
We won't grade :-(
Posted By: <b>Paul</b><p>If you're really disappointed in your E94 Young, I know someone interested in buying it (me).<br /><br />Paul
|
We won't grade :-(
Posted By: <b>dennis</b><p>i think we would see them on this board as fakes! bad scans but nice cards.
|
We won't grade :-(
Posted By: <b>dan mckee</b><p>If you submitted these only once and to only one grading service than SHAME on you! Submit at least 3 times per service and try the 3 leaders. They will be slabbed.
|
We won't grade :-(
Posted By: <b>Julie</b><p>but if I get results like you got (I don't know why) I reduce the resolution to "72". (If you're getting it with "72," reduce it to "50." That's as low as mine goes.
|
We won't grade :-(
Posted By: <b>Scott</b><p>I used to scan cards at a high resolution, then shrink them to post here or on ebay - many times I would get that checkerboard effect. When I scan at a resolution that doesn't require shrinking the image to post, the checkerboard effect doesn't occur. I also found that the checkerboard thing was more likely to happen when I scanned e-cards with the solid color backgrounds - rarely happened with t206's.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:10 PM. |