??? About Ruth Underwear Box-
 

Posted By: <b>Brock G.</b><p>I got this box top in the mail today and was a little thrown off. Other boxes I have seen in photos dont have the white border on top that mine does. The top of the box is entirerly green. Is mine a fake or is it just a different variation? Also the graphic on the box feels applied and not printed on the box. Is that the case in other Ruth underwear boxes? Thanks for the help.<br /><img src="http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh212/unconquered-1/MinStad021.jpg"><br />

??? About Ruth Underwear Box-
 

Posted By: <b>Dan Bretta</b><p>Never seen one like that...I'm going to guess that it's fake. It would be easy for a scammer to make a box like the one in your picture. A lot harder to fake the entire box.

??? About Ruth Underwear Box-
 

Posted By: <b>Jon Canfield</b><p>Actually, I think you're ok and it's not a fake although I believe it is not quite period. I believe there were two styles of the Ruth box, the "all green" was period and then your style was produced later. The main one you see is this one (image borrowed from the 2007 REA auction):<br /><br /><a href="http://s82.photobucket.com/albums/j263/jon_canfield/?action=view¤t=Item_336_1.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j263/jon_canfield/Item_336_1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a><br /><br />There is also this style which, I believe, is the style you bought. Here is one that sold in auction in 2007:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.antiquehelper.com/item.php?itemID=38082" target="_new" rel="nofollow">http://www.antiquehelper.com/item.php?itemID=38082</a><br /><br /><br /><a href="http://s82.photobucket.com/albums/j263/jon_canfield/?action=view¤t=38082.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j263/jon_canfield/38082.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a><br /><br />Notice on the photos of Ruth opening the underwear box, he is holding the "all green" box which I believe is the period piece.

??? About Ruth Underwear Box-
 

Posted By: <b>MikePugeda</b><p>Jon,<br /><br />It looks like both are all green with a little bit of white border. The auction pic you posted that is similar to Brock's and has a fat white border appears to have been flattened out and the white borders are the side panels.<br /><br />There were probably different products that sold in two or more diff. style boxes. One is more square and the other more rectangular. Perhaps they are both period.<br /><br />Edited to add: It appears as though part of the side panels on Brock's were cut away at some point.<br /><br />Mike

??? About Ruth Underwear Box-
 

Posted By: <b>Mike H</b><p>The thing that bothers me about Brock's piece is the poor centering on the box that differs from the Halper example. The color looks a little off perhaps. I know there are two different sizes, but I am not sure if date or the size of the contents determined the box. Here is mine.<br />[IMG]<img src="http://i139.photobucket.com/albums/q304/mjkm90/IMG_0226.jpg">[/IMG]

??? About Ruth Underwear Box-
 

Posted By: <b>Brock G.</b><p>Thanks for the help fellas. Mine came unfolded just like the one Jon posted. I have the corners paper clipped together on mine so its formed like a box in the photo. <br />I didn't even realize that the boxes are shaped slightly different. The ones without the wide white border are definetly more square. Keep the info coming!

??? About Ruth Underwear Box-
 

Posted By: <b>Tom Russo</b><p>I have had both types of boxes and currently own one similar to Brock's with the size stamped on the end flap of the box. The top picture does appear to be glued on and not particularly neatly as the glue has turned brown and is clearly seen around the edges. I cannot post a scan as I have packed up my collection for a move but the size of the white border, the color of glue, the gloss on the picture are all very similar to mine. If you have the two types side by side, it is obvious that the white border box is much more cheaply made. Perhaps a cost cutting move? After all, how strong does a box need to be to hold underwear?