![]() |
What's up with this card?
Posted By: <b>TBob</b><p>PSA 5 and obvious back damage. <BR><BR><img src="http://members.aol.com/trophybob/johnson.jpg"><BR><BR>Usually a card with this front and back damage is a PSA 2 Good or SGC 30. Makes you wonder if the grader had a heavy date that night.
|
What's up with this card?
Posted By: <b>leon</b><p>What do you mean? They only missed it by 2.5 to 3 grades. <img src="/images/happy.gif" height=14 width=14> ?
|
What's up with this card?
Posted By: <b>warshawlaw</b><p>who'd list this card in raw form as excellent condition. . .but I digress. <BR><BR>PSA is getting worse and worse (IMHO). Fake cards, tampered holders, overgraded cards, obvious trim jobs passing through (loved that trimmed OJ in Lipset's auction--how did any "expert" at PSA miss that one???), lost submissions. Scary.
|
What's up with this card?
Posted By: <b>Elliot</b><p>Recently I have received two cards graded PSA 5 and one card graded SGC60 with paper loss on the back---I wonder what's going on. I intend to bring them with me to the National.
|
What's up with this card?
Posted By: <b>TBob</b><p>because SGC continues to drop beautiful vintage cards with back damage down to SGC 30 even if the damage is small. At least they are consistent. This makes me really wonder what is going on with PSA.
|
What's up with this card?
Posted By: <b>julie</b><p>...
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:22 PM. |