How does SGC know this is a NADJA ???
 

Posted By: <b>Brian C Daniels&nbsp; </b><p>when 80% of blank backs from E-92's are from the Croft's Candy subset??? And then,how do we know that as well??? And if Jesse is "non profit",why does the IRS not pound on him for falsified Income tax returns?<BR><BR><a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1859564537" target=_new>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1859564537</a>

How does SGC know this is a NADJA ???
 

Posted By: <b>TBob</b><p>A "blank back" Najda Caramel card sounds too much like the guy who offered a T206 "Magie" card on ebay and swore that before the printing came off it was the variation card. In this case the card has its own intrinsic value but there is no way I know of to determine it is a Najda.

How does SGC know this is a NADJA ???
 

Posted By: <b>Brian C Daniels</b><p> I called them and asked them! I received no answer that is anything other than speculation! I sent them piles of scans of Croft's/Nadjas/Dockman's and yes, the font is slightly different on some but not with the one up for auction right now!

How does SGC know this is a NADJA ???
 

Posted By: <b>John Spencer</b><p>I think SGC really blew this one.It is without doubt a E92 Wagner blank back. Where they came up with the Nadja is a total puzzle.

How does SGC know this is a NADJA ???
 

Posted By: <b>petecld</b><p>Just going by the image I feel confident in saying it isn't a Nadja nor ever had the chance of being one. I would need to see the card in hand to say for sure but there really is no reason to call this a Nadja. <BR><BR>Of course every blank back on ebay is either a rare back or a "proof". <BR><BR>The only possible answer for SGC putting Nadja on the label is the submitter put that on the submission form and they used that.<BR><BR>Can't say it's anything but a mistake on SGC's part.<BR><BR>