Archive |
06-18-2002 03:31 PM |
Commentary
Posted By: <b>Elliot</b><p>I've been deeply troubled all day by the post by Jim Freeman, on many levels. First, I need to apologize for my delay in responding to it, but as most of you are aware, this isn't my full time job, and secondly I wanted to make sure I had my thoughts in order.<BR><BR>I have three problems with this attack---1) it was off-topic of this forum, although the information is public 2) it was essentially anonymous and 3) the attack on topic was unsubstantiated and anonymous.<BR><BR>I feel I need to balance these problems with the "gunslinger" approach on this board, which I think greatly increases the information flow.<BR><BR>Therefore, I propose the following guidelines: (I am calling these guidelines so I am not backed into a corner in the future, as the exact situation is very important) <BR><BR>1) As most of us know one another in one way or another, if a new poster wants to make a controversial statement, it will be necessary to provide some information (i.e. eBay name at the very least) either on the board or to me privately. (Bassin152@aol.com)<BR><BR>2) If a person is going to "attack" on a non-baseball card topic, the information MUST be in the public domain, and you only get one kick at the can. This is for all posters.<BR><BR>I've given these a lot of thought, but please give me your opinion(s).<BR><BR>I will be contacting Dan, and seeing if he wants parts of Jim Freeman's posts that do not meet the above criteria deleted. In the future they will be automatically deleted.<BR><BR>Best Regards,<BR><BR>Elliot<BR><BR>P.S. On a positive note, I don't know what everybody else thought, but what a wonderful exchange of thoughts on Cuban cards on the forum today.<BR><BR>
|