Trimmed??
 

Posted By: <b>Elliot&nbsp; </b><p>I wanted to get people's opinion on this card---<a href="http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1809317557" target=_new>http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1809317557</a><BR><BR>It looks short (T/B) but I have one that looks identical to this one, which measure perfectly, but I've always wondered if it was trimmed because of the appearance of smaller borders than some of my other Sport Kings.

Trimmed??
 

Posted By: <b>runscott</b><p>I can't get the "upload" feature to work, but I have a SK Hubbell that is both taller and wider than this Ruth

Trimmed??
 

Posted By: <b>HalleyGator</b><p>Maybe the Ruth SK cards had thinner borders than the Hubbell cards ... but if not, then it must be trimmed because King Carl has much more border:<BR><BR>[img]<img src="http://www.lewisbaseballcards.com/classes/baseBallCard/images/523Lg.jpg">[/img]

Trimmed??
 

Posted By: <b>jay behrens</b><p>I've handled a lot of Sport Kings over the years and the boarder looks thin all the way around.<BR><BR>Jay

Trimmed??
 

Posted By: <b>MW</b><p>Based on the copies that I've seen and that I own of this card, I agree with Jay -- it is undoubtedly undersized.

Trimmed??
 

Posted By: <b>Brian C Daniels</b><p>Wish I had kept the pix of this one prior to it being graded.....enlarged it had "hang nails" or "natural" ( unpolished ) surface areas as we say in the gemological World! The hang nail effect of card board exstending off the edge in various places would ensure your lack of interest in bidding on this card...if you get my drift!