![]() |
PSA Scandal -- buy back 9s, resell as 10s
One of the other threads referenced a scandal at PSA. I hadn't heard about this, so I googled it. Came up with a recent incident where a guy submitted 30 Pokemon cards, got all 9s. He then accepted the PSA buy back offer.
Shortly thereafter, PSA relists the same cards -- same cert numbers -- for sale as 10s. Is this the scandal that people are talking about? If so, it sounds pretty bad. |
Yes. And again, from the opening narration of the Outer Limits.
We control the horizontal. We control the vertical. Brazen if true, ain't it? |
There have been other reports of this happening also…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
How did PSA explain that one? It's so....bad.
|
At some point, when the customers are this stupid and keep throwing money at them and excusing all the blatant incompetence and corruption, it's hard to blame PSA for taking advantages of these morons who just reward them no matter what.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Well, I don't submit much for grading, but I do purchase my fair share of PSA-graded cards. I knew there was some BS when it came to differentiating 9s and 10s, particularly for modern cards, but this lays bare the reason for the lack of differentiation. |
Quote:
|
Is there any photo evidence of this?
|
PSA scandal
If true I'd be shocked, I tell you- just shocked. Their sterling reputation
speaks for itself! Trent King |
|
Why allow the offers before the grades are finalized?
I had a related problem that I actually went to Nat with years ago I was upcharged for a card that got a 4. I called the consignor with the good news, then, two days later, they reversed the upcharge and gave me a 3, so I actually believe this can happen, but why the hell would you allow the offer (or in my case initiate the upcharge) until the process was complete. Oddly he agreed that it was screwed up at the time. I've been telling people it's not PSA making the offers, but nobody wants to listen to that. |
Quote:
Two product teams not doing enough integration testing. Lesson learned for them. Nat is a tech guy before anything else. I doubt this defect exists in a week or two. |
Here’s a shorts video showing what bk400 referenced
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/jcX6LcCmvHc |
So did 30 nines turn into 30 tens…or was it just a small percentage of the submission that was upgraded on review?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Question ? Nat Turner said it's not PSA Buying but a Network of Third Party Buyers... Who are the third party buyers? How would one get to be a part of the these third party buyers?
|
I wonder how often this happening with vintage. Not 9s to 10s, but what about 5s to 7s. And very hard to prove with vintage cards.
|
I love these threads and the ballet of lies that are the business model of the opinion sellers.
Doug "Happy to beat living, yet considered dead, horses since April 2009" Goodman |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
What doesn't add up to me is that the QA Checks part of the process takes place BEFORE the grades are revealed:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And as for putting any stock at all in what Goof Wilson says… keep in mind that he is heavily sponsored by PSA. Not exactly the place to go for an objective or insightful opinion. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
. . . |
At what point do people finally pull their heads out of their a$$es and just admit this part of the "hobby" is compromised.
Do people actually believe this crap doesn't happen, frequently? . . . |
Just as an FYI
Just as they do at Burbank, PSA will be setting up in Geoff's Store (Cards HQ) going forward
https://www.cardshq.com/pages/gradin...JMD9XcAtDSpX1K |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:26 PM. |