Net54baseball.com Forums - Place your bets! 52 Topps Mantle playing days signed!
Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Place your bets! 52 Topps Mantle playing days signed! (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=364138)

brunswickreeves 08-22-2025 01:09 PM

Place your bets! 52 Topps Mantle playing days signed!
 
2 Attachment(s)
Place your bets! Anyone see this 52 Topps Mantle playing days signed card at the National? HA is auctioning it this fall. Should be an epic showdown for this mind blowing national treasure.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DMvIg-KM...m_source=igweb

If the Jordan/Kobe signed 1 of 1 Logoman goes for $7-8MM, how will this vintage signed Mantle compare?

https://sports.ha.com/itm/basketball...ription-071515

Republicaninmass 08-22-2025 01:58 PM

Better than Uncle Jimmy, Blasphemous!

225k

gunboat82 08-22-2025 02:22 PM

I'm bad at this game, but I'll say $1.2M.

A PSA/DNA 3/10 with a newer signature went for $422K in 2023, then the same card went for almost $800K in 2024.

This one's not as pretty, but the people who will bid on this have obscene amounts of money to throw around and would probably pay a premium for the old signature.

On the other hand, a 1951 Bowman Mantle with the old signature went for just $54K earlier this year. I'd probably rather have that and a vacation home on Lake Winnipesaukee over the 1952 Topps.

robertsmithnocure 08-22-2025 10:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Republicaninmass (Post 2534402)
Better than Uncle Jimmy, Blasphemous!

225k


I will guess at least 2X that.

Lucas00 08-22-2025 11:05 PM

1m exactly is my guess.

Bigdaddy 08-22-2025 11:06 PM

I'd bet it touches 1M with the juice.

egri 08-24-2025 10:07 PM

On a good day, $750,000. On a bad day, maybe $500,00.

GregC 08-24-2025 11:08 PM

I say 1M. Only 2 of the 21 are from his playing days, the other 19 are post retirement.

samosa4u 08-24-2025 11:36 PM

How do we know some little boy didn't get his older sister to sign that? :D

Vintagedeputy 08-25-2025 06:18 AM

1.2M is my guess.

Republicaninmass 08-25-2025 07:22 AM

the highest graded copy (tied) just cracked 1 million last night. A PSA 5.5 with auto grade of 8.

$1,0067,500

calvindog 08-25-2025 07:25 AM

These crazy numbers for cardboard are instruments of class war designed to guarantee the domination of the working class.

pawpawdiv9 08-25-2025 07:26 AM

I’d say 500k +bp

BillyCoxDodgers3B 08-25-2025 07:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 2534971)
These crazy numbers for cardboard are instruments of class war designed to guarantee the domination of the working class.

Sen. McCarthy would like to have a word ;)

BillyCoxDodgers3B 08-25-2025 07:58 AM

$1.2-1.6m

Kzoo 08-25-2025 09:13 AM

I'm looking forward to seeing the rest of this collection at auction. There were probably 20 more vintage signed cards from this era on display at their National booth.

egri 08-27-2025 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kzoo (Post 2534996)
I'm looking forward to seeing the rest of this collection at auction. There were probably 20 more vintage signed cards from this era on display at their National booth.

Same here. I’m hoping there will be some 1953 Topps I need. I’ll probably get blown out of the water, but at least I’d know they’re out there.

Lucas00 08-27-2025 07:01 PM

Would not be at all surprising if Geoff Wilson goes for this mantle.

uniship 08-27-2025 08:26 PM

IMO easily $2m+++

Card is a unicorn of unicorns.

Johnny630 08-28-2025 09:49 AM

3.5 Million

conor912 08-29-2025 07:57 AM

I realize I might be in the vast minority here, but I have never liked signed cards that also have a facsimile signature. Something about the redundancy makes the card look cluttered to my eye.

gunboat82 08-29-2025 08:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by conor912 (Post 2535902)
I realize I might be in the vast minority here, but I have never liked signed cards that also have a facsimile signature. Something about the redundancy makes the card look cluttered to my eye.

You're not alone. The 1955 and 1956 Topps autos are the worst for that, because the signatures are often in roughly the same place. The redundancy still triggers my OCD with 1952 Topps, but it's a little better because the facsimile is confined to a box.

brunswickreeves 08-29-2025 09:35 AM

I never thought or looked at it that way, but see what you mean.

What’s amazing about this Mantle early playing days signature is that it’s remarkably similar to his facsimile signature in the box, which actually is the signature Topps used from the player’s contracts for these cards. It actually memorializes Mantle’s signature to his playing days.

bleeckerstreetcards 08-29-2025 09:43 PM

It won't sell below $700,000. My guess is $840k

gunboat82 08-30-2025 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brunswickreeves (Post 2535916)
I never thought or looked at it that way, but see what you mean.

What’s amazing about this Mantle early playing days signature is that it’s remarkably similar to his facsimile signature in the box, which actually is the signature Topps used from the player’s contracts for these cards. It actually memorializes Mantle’s signature to his playing days.

That’s an interesting factoid. So if they used signatures from the contracts, why is the “e” in Mantle’s Type 1 52T signature different from the one in these Type 2s? I understand the other design differences, but not the signature.

brunswickreeves 08-30-2025 08:53 AM

Good question, not sure why. However, here’s the article about it:
https://www.cardboardconnection.com/...ll-cards-2/amp


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:20 AM.