![]() |
Hmmm. Don't know.
2 Attachment(s)
.
|
Do you have it in hand? I’m at 99+% not authentic.
|
I have my concerns. It is in transit.
|
I see “the crackle” on the white of the uniform. The crackle never lies, in my experience.
|
Quote:
:) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:rolleyes: |
Quote:
Thank you. |
At a glance, first thoughts are.. no one would go through the trouble of faking this and it looks good enough. But then, yeah, the crackle, and the sort of artificial looking abrasions make me think it's no good. Damn. We gotta be careful out there. :confused: On the plus side though, PSA is probably about 50/50 on grading it as authentic. haha
|
Please explain what the crackle is in the uniform.
|
Yuck. Besides the crackle, I have never seen such an unfocused T227. Even the printing on back is out of focus. Unless it's a bad scan it's a bad card.
. |
Quote:
Look at the Burdick Collection example of this card and you'll see there are very similar flaws -- an abrasion at top right, a big chip of paper loss at bottom right -- but actual period paper/card stock behaves very differently. https://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/694935 |
I thought it was Richard "7-Finger" Marquard until I looked at a copy with better focus.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yeah, it’s on the back too. It’s just what you think it is. A cracked/crackling surface appearance on a fake card when soaked in a discoloring agent such as tea or coffee. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...ba8b3f17ef.jpg |
Quote:
|
Looking at the centering and focus, I say you’ve got one the usual culprits that’s taken a tea bath and beating.
https://www.etsy.com/listing/1497424...12-t227-series |
Quote:
|
Thank you for the visual on the cracked/crackling surface appearance.. Learned something new..
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:01 AM. |