![]() |
t206 Grading for Pen marks on back of card: SGC vs PSA
4 Attachment(s)
I have a few off back T206 cards like the Konetchy EPDG and the Overall Sovereign below that I wanted to send in for grading. Normally if the factory is irrelevant I send them to SGC. I was going to send these to SGC but I recall hearing somewhere that SGC is really hard on cards with pen or pencil marks? Like you wont get above a 2. PSA I know does the qualifier MK and grades the card normally. I have had success with PSA in the past getting a few 3s with the qualifier.
Curious if anyone has any experience with SGC being extra hard on cards with marks or writing on them. Much Appreciated. |
Either way, you're looking at a 1.5 at SGC (most likely) or a 2(MK) or 3(MK) from PSA.
When it comes to PSA, you're really talking 2 things: the Set Registry/collectors and the grade. Quote:
For these, I don't think it matters that much. They're low grade with or without the marks. If they were like 6(MK), they'd be more valuable as PSA 4s for the registry. |
I hate the way that PSA uses qualifiers and much prefer the SGC system. Saying that this card is a 4 except that it has a pen mark is like saying that my wife is gorgeous except that she’s fat. Doesn’t work for me.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:29 PM. |