![]() |
Card Defect or Photo Defect?
Auction ends shortly and I'm just curious what others think. On the back, is that defect on the card or is it a glare in the photo only? It looks like it's on the card to me, but I can't imagine it grading a 4 if it's a defect on the card. Thoughts?
https://www.ebay.com/itm/395159321732 Brad |
Quote:
|
I certainly can't be positive, but to me it looks like remnants of a removed label or price tag from purchase.
I would hope PSA would notice that much card damage as the card should not be higher than a 1.5 is that was the actual card. |
Looks like the defect is on the card...
1 Attachment(s)
Pic from the PSA website
|
Thanks for adding the PSA photo, I guess that clears it up.
At best it's a print defect, at worse it's missing paper. Bad look. |
Does not look a print defect to me. Wonder who subbed that.
|
Looks like a PSA 1.5
|
Certainly not the best 4, but PSA sometimes notoriously doesn't care about the backs of cards.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:50 AM. |