Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   1934 MLB Tour of Japan signed baseball - Halper (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=341114)

Ribbens 10-03-2023 03:36 PM

1934 MLB Tour of Japan signed baseball - Halper
 
6 Attachment(s)
Here is the baseball in question. Thanks for any feedback.

NiceDocter 10-03-2023 04:02 PM

Question
 
Im not sure if a Barry Halper letter makes it more or less likely to be real. The guy had a great collection but also had some famous fake stuff too ( probably unknowingly)….. a warning to all of us who get so excited about the stuff that sometimes logic goes out the window. All that said, those signatures look pretty solid …. curious how the ink is so similar in width, strength, size etc on almost all the names. Babe did go for the BIG autograph . I will be interested to see what truly knowledgeable autograph people on here think. Hope it’s real…..

Ribbens 10-03-2023 04:40 PM

Thanks for your observations, I understand the Halper letter isn't a COA and complicates the issue.

WhatsNext 10-03-2023 04:44 PM

I'm not an expert on any of these guys, but two things give me pause:

1. The ball is signed in some kind of felt tip marker, like a skinny Sharpie. I don't think those pens were really around back then; fountain pens would be far more common.

2. Some of the signatures look very shaky and deliberate, I can see points where it looks like they stop and start where they shouldn't.

Klrdds 10-03-2023 05:09 PM

To me it looks like a bad C C special with a fake LOA as well.

perezfan 10-03-2023 05:52 PM

Fake sigs / fake LOA. Avoid!

BillyCoxDodgers3B 10-03-2023 05:59 PM

Oh, come on...Stevie Wonder could see this was bad.

Bpm0014 10-03-2023 09:00 PM

Awful awful awful

todeen 10-03-2023 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhatsNext (Post 2378016)
I'm not an expert on any of these guys, but two things give me pause:



1. The ball is signed in some kind of felt tip marker, like a skinny Sharpie. I don't think those pens were really around back then; fountain pens would be far more common.



2. Some of the signatures look very shaky and deliberate, I can see points where it looks like they stop and start where they shouldn't.

I've got a few team signed balls; my oldest is 1940, another is 1943. I agree with above post that the style of pen seems wrong. But also, some of the signatures should be at different levels of fading. they should not all be signed like it was a year ago.

Sent from my SM-G9900 using Tapatalk

Duluth Eskimo 10-03-2023 10:12 PM

I agree. Ball is no good. Many red flags here, it writing instrument, same pen pressure, all signed in similar hand, perfect spacing, etc etc. these should be red flags in general.

roarfrom34 10-04-2023 05:45 AM

Ken Smith never owned that ball and Barry Halper never wrote that letter (I started to see these phony letters pop up about 10-12 years after he passed away)

Ribbens 10-04-2023 05:48 AM

Thanks for all your comments and observations, greatly appreciate this feedback.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:47 PM.