Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Another successful Net54 connection - thx Derek G! (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=339081)

Belfast1933 08-12-2023 08:14 AM

Another successful Net54 connection - thx Derek G!
 
2 Attachment(s)
I want to send a shout out if thanks to Derek Granger, a long time Net54 member who I have just recently had the pleasure of making a deal with - Derek and I completed a deal recently and I added my first-ever Sandy Koufax rookie to my Pc which is now proudly on display in my “Card Cave” - see below.

Thx again, Derek - looking forward to reconnecting again in the future - cheers to the “978” area code!

(Sorry for the sideways images… never could master how to fix that)


Jeff

Leon 08-12-2023 11:00 AM

Great looking Sandy and others.

(got the photos rotated for ya')

BillyCoxDodgers3B 08-12-2023 11:04 AM

This uber-strict grading of the last couple of years really leaves me scratching my head. The absolutely beautiful work of art you have presented above is apparently a "3". So, someone is trying to tell us that this piece is only 30% towards being perfect? Unless the back is truly hideous, that's ridiculous. What would this have been before the TPG standards were reinvented? A 5?

I haven't collected unsigned cards in over 30 years, but if I did, they would all be raw.

Either way, you can be proud to own that one. For my needs, I'd never want an upgrade on that beauty.

ClementeFanOh 08-12-2023 12:31 PM

net54 connection
 
I enjoy reading posts like these, that's exactly how it should go. Trent King

PS- That's a nice Batcave, Jeff!!

rjackson44 08-12-2023 01:12 PM

Terrific

t206fanatic 08-12-2023 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BillyCoxDodgers3B (Post 2363736)
This uber-strict grading of the last couple of years really leaves me scratching my head. The absolutely beautiful work of art you have presented above is apparently a "3". So, someone is trying to tell us that this piece is only 30% towards being perfect? Unless the back is truly hideous, that's ridiculous. What would this have been before the TPG standards were reinvented? A 5?

I haven't collected unsigned cards in over 30 years, but if I did, they would all be raw.

Either way, you can be proud to own that one. For my needs, I'd never want an upgrade on that beauty.

it is a beautiful card!

there appears to be a wrinkle / crease on Sandy's ear, I know the TPG's are very harsh on any bends.

BillyCoxDodgers3B 08-12-2023 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by t206fanatic (Post 2363816)
it is a beautiful card!

there appears to be a wrinkle / crease on Sandy's ear, I know the TPG's are very harsh on any bends.

Aah, that would do it. Truthfully, I thought that looked like a scuff on the holder. If not, there's the easy explanation.

But, if you're looking at a card and are more focused on all of its attributes than the things going against it, that's the best sign of a great card, no matter what the grade. This one is just beautiful, and like all of us, I've certainly seen lots of the Sandy RC. The colors are so crisp, everything is crystal clear, and I just love the centering. Some centering purists may tell me I'm off, who knows? The only detrimental aspect may be that staining along the top. If it is indeed a crease or wrinkle as you say, that wouldn't attract my eye as much as the stain. Again, just a stellar card for the grade IMHO.

Jewish-collector 08-12-2023 06:21 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Mazel Tov Jeff Attachment 584293Attachment 584293Attachment 584293

h2oya311 08-13-2023 10:57 PM

Thanks for the shout-out, Jeff! I always appreciate working with other collectors who understand that this isn’t your typical “3”. This card is the definition of “collector grade”.

Hope to work with you again in the future!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:58 AM.