![]() |
1949 Bowman Jackie Roninson - Real or Fake?
1 Attachment(s)
I think it's fake, but I don't want to disclose why so as not to sway other opinions. I would appreciate your thoughts as to whether you think it's real or fake (and, if so, why)? Thanks!
|
1 Attachment(s)
Back scan
|
This card is the exact reason why if I buy high end vintage, I buy graded. I would not be able to tell
Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk |
Fwiw I don’t think it looks good. It seems artificially aged and the pixelation around his face looks a bit wrong. I’m not 100% certain though. It’s a free opinion in any event.
|
I don't like the look of the edges on all 4 sides, not to mention the back seems artificially aged. I vote not genuine.
|
I vote fake as well; it seems artificially aged, and the illustration just doesn't look right to me.
|
1 Attachment(s)
If it helps the effort, I cobbled together four different graded versions from eBay for comparison purposes...
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...07e36b75_h.jpg Attachment 496723 |
Quote:
There's one for sale at at local show. The dealer wants $500. In the condition that it's in, I still think it's a $1500-$2000 card. I have the dealers info, so if it does end up being a fake I can go back to him. Others commented on the back looking artificially agaed. I noticed that too, but I think something may have happened to the back to make it appear like that. It's not like that on the front. I found some other '49 Bowman here to compare it to and it feels like the other '49 Bowmans. We'll see. |
I was going to be the contrarian who said he liked it. At $500 it's a good thing I don't know where it is, or you'd never get it :D
|
Hard for me to tell from the front, but the back looks bad. My vote is fake.
|
I don’t know how to explain it, but certain cards just don’t look right to me. I can’t pinpoint anything specific, but this is one of those cards that doesn’t look right. Without seeing it in hand I’d stay away from this one
|
Quote:
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk |
Any updates?
|
I thin k it is real as registration is off a little on the front. Why would you reprint it that way?
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I sent my 50 Bowman Jackie to PSA to get slab even if altered (a legit seller had in a lucite for decades) and they screwed it up. So it hung out in CA for months for nothing....At least they didn't charge me. But now I will send it to SGC, so I'll get it back quickly. So take care in filling out PSA's form...
|
Quote:
|
I vote real as well. The registration sucks but that back is just drawer worn and dirty. There is no alligatoring from a tea soak, without having it in hand I say good but just honest wear.
|
1 Attachment(s)
The "Goudey Ruth opinion" thread reminded me of this post. Thanks for all the replies. To close this out, the card was submitted to PSA and came back as a PSA 1 and was sold at the February TriStar show.
|
Nice!! Congrats!
Bob |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:10 PM. |