Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Tale of 2 Mattys (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=310828)

Oscar_Stanage 11-21-2021 05:45 AM

Tale of 2 Mattys
 
How was there such a price disparity between these 2 cards? am I missing something? different backs?

https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball/1...ription-071515

https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball/1...ription-071515

Carter08 11-21-2021 05:52 AM

Interesting - look darn similar to me

mrreality68 11-21-2021 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wid_Conroy (Post 2166507)
How was there such a price disparity between these 2 cards? am I missing something? different backs?

https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball/1...ription-071515

https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball/1...ription-071515

Hi

They both look great and they both are 150 Piedmont Backs.and both the centering and coloring both look similar.
I am at a loss. I am probably missing something obvious.
MAy just be as simple as 2 bidders got into a bidding war on the 1 card and did not look/see the other
Interesting to see what others say.

Oscar_Stanage 11-21-2021 05:55 AM

$2580 is way more than the range of SGC/PSA3s. this is a beauty, but is it exemplary in some way that I cannot tell?

Rhotchkiss 11-21-2021 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrreality68 (Post 2166515)
MAy just be as simple as 2 bidders got into a bidding war on the 1 card and did not look/see the other

+1. I expect this is the reason

vthobby 11-21-2021 01:46 PM

Hey!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Wid_Conroy (Post 2166507)
How was there such a price disparity between these 2 cards? am I missing something? different backs?

https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball/1...ription-071515

https://sports.ha.com/itm/baseball/1...ription-071515

Wid,
I had not seen the prices until after I made my decision and I was correct. The one that went lower has a great look and centering but that chuck missing on lower left corner stood out. I exaggerate but it really stands out compared to the other one. I'd prefer the higher priced one but not sure I would have paid that much more. I just like the overall look of the higher priced one. Just my 2 cents!

Peace, Mike

Pat R 11-21-2021 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mrreality68 (Post 2166515)
Hi

They both look great and they both are 150 Piedmont Backs.and both the centering and coloring both look similar.
I am at a loss. I am probably missing something obvious.
MAy just be as simple as 2 bidders got into a bidding war on the 1 card and did not look/see the other
Interesting to see what others say.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhotchkiss (Post 2166531)
+1. I expect this is the reason


Or 1 bidder bidding against the consigner.

Oscar_Stanage 11-21-2021 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vtgmsc (Post 2166676)
Wid,
I had not seen the prices until after I made my decision and I was correct. The one that went lower has a great look and centering but that chuck missing on lower left corner stood out. I exaggerate but it really stands out compared to the other one. I'd prefer the higher priced one but not sure I would have paid that much more. I just like the overall look of the higher priced one. Just my 2 cents!

Peace, Mike

I agree the other is superior for that reason. however, the absolute price is still way above that grade range. I guess if you hone in on a card you want, you don't care about price


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:01 AM.