|
Let's see your "buy the card not the slab" cards!
|
1 Attachment(s)
I'll take "1's" like these any day.
- |
1 Attachment(s)
I got this T206 HOFer on the cheap because of minor paper loss on the back and a low technical grade.
|
1 Attachment(s)
This one.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Princely for the grade. (No creases or wrinkles)
|
Great examples everyone. Love the low grade high eye appeal cards.
https://www.net54baseball.com/pictur...ictureid=27795https://www.net54baseball.com/pictur...ictureid=27794 |
I'll go with all of the below-- avg grade of the cards in this pic is probably 3.5
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...db933989_c.jpg |
Quote:
Nice set Matty, including one of the most underrated cards IMO, 54 WF Williams. |
Yup just a little bit of a Mick fan. (I'm stuck in the Yankee past as the present is too painful LOL.) Planning to actually prune my Mick doubles soon so as to get some diversity in the collection. 54 WF Ted is a fave. My young son's too; he calls it "the hot dog Ted Williams" and it is one card I can tell will be in the fam for a long time.
|
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
Worlds nicest 1. No pin holes. No qualifiers. Super sharp.
|
2 Attachment(s)
Wish I could build a set like this!!
|
wow, what a thread!
|
Walter Johnson via Canada
1 Attachment(s)
This has an issue on the back, but the front is pretty good.
https://www.net54baseball.com/attach...1&d=1622895572 |
1 Attachment(s)
A little paper loss on the back and some little something on the front.
I can live with it: Attachment 462245 |
|
I've seen worse cards in "5" and "6" holders than that Cobb. Maybe that's a thread idea..."Oops, I bought the slab not the card" :D
Quote:
|
A "1.5" doesn't get much better than this one.
http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...uponChance.jpg.http://photos.imageevent.com/tedzan7...onChanceBx.jpg TED Z T206 Reference . |
|
1 Attachment(s)
My best 2...
|
|
T206 Cobb Piedmont 42
2 Attachment(s)
It has a paper rub on upper right border, kind of perfect place to have it!
|
Pickup this week. Thanks Chris! (iconsportscards)
https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/...5c062918_c.jpg |
2 Attachment(s)
In the 80's this was called, "mint"
|
4 Attachment(s)
Really, most of my graded cards fit this description. The 53 Bowman Rizzuto/Martin has some transparent glue on the back, but otherwise is beautiful, the 33 Goudey Hoyt has a surface wrinkle, and the Pennock has paper loss on the back. Sometimes you have to be thankful for the absurdities of grading, because otherwise these cards would have been a lot more expensive.
|
1 Attachment(s)
No idea what's "wrong" with this card. Thrilled to have it in my collection
|
|
Quote:
|
|
|
6 Attachment(s)
Ah, where should I start?...
|
|
|
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
|
|
Quote:
Now that's something you don't see too often! On my list of "Want it, will never be able to afford it!" |
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
My 1956 Topps Mantle WB…
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...a12f5f221f.jpg Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
This is precisely what I build my vintage collection around!
https://tanmanbaseballfan.com/wp-con.../02/n28set.jpg https://tanmanbaseballfan.com/wp-con.../greencobb.jpg https://tanmanbaseballfan.com/wp-con.../02/wagner.jpg https://tanmanbaseballfan.com/wp-con...cjshoeless.jpg Probably the wildest ... https://tanmanbaseballfan.com/wp-con...02/33ruth3.jpg |
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
These should fit the description.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Rounded corners but a nice card for a 1.5.
. |
Good heavens yes please!
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Wow! |
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 PM. |