Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Philosophical Grading Question - 33 Ruth #144 (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=297611)

Schlesinj 02-27-2021 01:18 PM

Philosophical Grading Question - 33 Ruth #144
 
1 Attachment(s)
I said what the hell last weekend and won this last week from the Uncle Jimmy Collection Ruth. I have seen some pretty rough ones being sold, so I figured this had some nice eye appeal. I am not selling it, but figured I would ask some experts.

Without looking at the clubhouse signature, what do you think the card would grade?

Attachment 442976

Schlesinj 02-27-2021 01:19 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 442983

sycks22 02-27-2021 01:44 PM

Sorry to bring some bad news, but PSA / BGS / SGC won't grade just the card with the secretarial auto on it. I just tried with one of my higher end cards. They won't slab the card even authentic.

Aquarian Sports Cards 02-27-2021 01:54 PM

As Pete noted the reality, for the philosophy of the question I would say a "4" provided that top edge isn't trimmed.

perezfan 02-27-2021 02:09 PM

I would've said 4.5, but you'll need to tell us if there are any creases/surface wrinkles. These often don't show up in scans like that, and definitely factor into the grade.

Definitely for the better, that PSA won't grade it... The card won't be absent from your collection for 10+ months, you won't risk damage or loss in shipping, you'll save yourself lots of money, and you won't have to see their negative assessment on the flip every time you look at it.

riggs336 02-27-2021 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sycks22 (Post 2074235)
Sorry to bring some bad news, but PSA / BGS / SGC won't grade just the card with the secretarial auto on it. I just tried with one of my higher end cards. They won't slab the card even authentic.

I submitted a question regarding this subject to PSA some time ago. I specifically asked if PSA would grade a card with an inauthentic signature as a regular card, albeit with a MK qualifier.
This is the response I received

Thank you for contacting PSA Customer Service. We apologize for our delayed response.

If you submit the card for card authentication/grading only and it has writing on it, it will be graded with the MK qualifier. I would suggest adding notes under the 'Submission Comments/Requests' on your Online Submission form so that our authenticators are aware of the inauthentic autograph on your cards.

Schlesinj 02-27-2021 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sycks22 (Post 2074235)
Sorry to bring some bad news, but PSA / BGS / SGC won't grade just the card with the secretarial auto on it. I just tried with one of my higher end cards. They won't slab the card even authentic.

Thanks, I know and understand that. Makes perfect sense.

Schlesinj 02-27-2021 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by perezfan (Post 2074246)
I would've said 4.5, but you'll need to tell us if there are any creases/surface wrinkles. These often don't show up in scans like that, and definitely factor into the grade.

Definitely for the better, that PSA won't grade it... The card won't be absent from your collection for 10+ months, you won't risk damage or loss in shipping, you'll save yourself lots of money, and you won't have to see their negative assessment on the flip every time you look at it.

Not that can see with the naked eye. I agree and look forward to enjoying it.

Thanks

swarmee 02-27-2021 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by riggs336 (Post 2074253)
I submitted a question regarding this subject to PSA some time ago. I specifically asked if PSA would grade a card with an inauthentic signature as a regular card, albeit with a MK qualifier.
This is the response I received

Thank you for contacting PSA Customer Service. We apologize for our delayed response.

If you submit the card for card authentication/grading only and it has writing on it, it will be graded with the MK qualifier. I would suggest adding notes under the 'Submission Comments/Requests' on your Online Submission form so that our authenticators are aware of the inauthentic autograph on your cards.

This is pretty stupid of them. First, they're actually willing to slab it with a MK qualifier. Second, you have to tell them the auto is fake... ;-)

If they are going to slab this card with a number grade, they need to put something on the flip like "AUTOGRAPH NOT AUTHENTIC" or buyers are going to get confused and people are going to try and pawn it off as real.

Schlesinj 02-27-2021 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swarmee (Post 2074284)
This is pretty stupid of them. First, they're actually willing to slab it with a MK qualifier. Second, you have to tell them the auto is fake... ;-)

If they are going to slab this card with a number grade, they need to put something on the flip like "AUTOGRAPH NOT AUTHENTIC" or buyers are going to get confused and people are going to try and pawn it off as real.

Based on communication with Chuck/Stacey PSA would not slab like the others. Not sure if the work around as suggested above was discussed, but I would think if something was marked “Authentic” that would be confusing. An interesting situation in general.

riggs336 02-27-2021 04:15 PM

The PSA response I quoted in post #6 above came from a Hector Ortega.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:17 AM.