Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   1955 Topps set: How common are they O/C? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=296456)

clydepepper 02-10-2021 10:05 AM

1955 Topps set: How common are they O/C?
 
8 Attachment(s)
Here are my four graded cards from this set. You will notice that none of them are qualified grades.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Did PSA start labeling them as o/c sometime after mine had been graded, did they just miss them or is this a chronic issue with the set?


?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????

From what I can see only the Koufax front would be considered centered.

Attachment 439932Attachment 439933

Attachment 439934Attachment 439935

Attachment 439936Attachment 439937

Attachment 439938Attachment 439939

clydepepper 02-10-2021 02:15 PM

Anyone have some knowledge on this subject they can share?

Thanks in advance.

Harliduck 02-10-2021 02:22 PM

I have the 55 set minus a couple cards (REGRET selling them, now looking to rebuy) and can say my set if graded would range from 2 to a couple maybe hitting 6...most live in the 3 range. I do have a nice SGC 6 Killebrew ( I have several raw versions as well, favorite player) and after reading your post thumbed through the binder. I'd say 60% of my set is somewhat OC, some worse, some slight. But clearly a decent representative of cards and I would easily say it was tough to find really tight centering. I think the layout of the cards lends to forgive some OC, much like the 54s.

Anyhow...just a guy looking through his cards, but yes, more OC percantage wise than most years would be my opinion...but speaking to how PSA has handled it, no clue.

JollyElm 02-10-2021 02:26 PM

I believe the answer lies in the numbers your cards received. PSA has a sliding scale of centering requirements, so examples that may look a bit OC to the common eye, actually fit into the centering parameters of a 5, 6 or 7. If any of these cards were given an 8, then the OC would've been put on the label.

swarmee 02-10-2021 05:24 PM

AFAIK, they have had qualifiers for a long time, but they've always been inconsistent in their use. As mentioned, most have no problem meeting the centering requirements for the grades they were given, but I would have given the Mays an OC as a 7. Back centering means less than front centering, per their own rules, easily found on their website.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:08 AM.