Another PSA mess up? major card - AA to 5
6 Attachment(s)
This was posted on another site I visit (not blowout)- sorry to have to do this via pics. SuperDan from BODA believes that a PSA Altered, t206 Red Cobb, Carolina Brights, now sits in a PSA 5 flip.
You all decide. To all PSA apologists, this is not mere PSA-hating: even if there was no foul play, there is simply no excuse for a card of this caliber to go from an AA flip to a 5, period. I am fairly sure it is, or was until recently, part of the David Hall collection, which if true, does not look good either. I would hate to be the guy who spent all that money for a card these experts once determined was altered.... “Never get Cheated” |
Thos epics are very very low quality. Can you link us to original images?
|
Can you please post better photos
|
Yes, please...better pics.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
7 Attachment(s)
Lets see if these are better. I will link the site/thread if I am permitted to do so.
|
Technically David Hall still owns it. He purchased it in the PSA 5 holder and it
hasn't come up for sale in one of his auctions yet. |
Wow, cut and dry same card. Thank you for posting
|
Quote:
|
Match!
That's a match Ryan. There are several small spots on the top border which are the same on both images. Thanks for posting,
|
|
Nice find Chris. So the same card went from a 4, to an A, to a 5.....
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yeah, definitely the same card as others have said. I wonder what the supposed alteration was? The card does look super sharp for a 4, let alone a 5.
|
If they are all the same card, the latest version appears darker to me. The red appears darker.
The latest version is also missing the small white speck near Cobb’s ear. The A-A version shows a white speck near Cobbs left ear (card’s right side) while the latest one does not. |
Such a shame, looked like a great card before. I wish people valued and paid more for wider borders. Wider the border, higher price for the card. That'd be hard to fake.
But I'm also a guy who thinks school teachers should get paid more than school administrators. Don't think either one of those is happening anytime soon. |
What if nothing was actually done to it? 1st submitter gets a 4, he or the next owner thinks it's nicer, cracks and resubmits, gets an A. He or the next party that owns it, cracks and resubmits again, get a 5.
This happens all the time, cards are continually submitted, cracked and resubmitted just to get a better grade, without actually doing anything to the card. Not saying that is the absolute case here, as the card cannot reasonably be examined via scans. But on first glance it appears identical in all three holders. After further review of the scans, the AA does appear to have a narrower right border.... |
Quote:
. |
Quote:
|
Next steps
I completely agree PSA was incompetent with this card.
Does the owner of this card know of these issues? And, if so, what does this person do about it? I'm sure PSA will not do anything about it. If they do a grade review, they're not going to admit to slabbing an altered card. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Many things can come out of a grading submission that will make you really shake your head, both good and bad. So yes, consistency is an issue. Take ten-twenty cards with the same numerical grade from the many years(decades) of grading and you will see a wide variance of appearances. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:43 PM. |