![]() |
Is this Babe Ruth photo a Type 1?
2 Attachment(s)
Hi, I'm not so familiar with Type 1 photos. Is anyone able to tell me if this Ruth photo is a Type 1? Thanks!
|
If that is not an original signature the answer is no. It would be a second generation photo. It is a nice silver gelatin print and appears to be on doubleweight paper.
|
Yes it’s an original signature. If it’s signed it can’t be a type 1? I once had a signed Gehrig that was a type 1. Thanks
|
Are you SURE it’s an original signature?
|
It’s certified by PSA DNA
|
What does PSA say it is, or did just certifty the sig?
|
Quote:
|
Just the autograph is certified. I was wondering if it’s a Type 1 photo. Thanks
|
Quote:
Weird that you had them certify the signature but not the photo . . . . |
I still not convinced Ruth signed this. If he did, it was super late in life. Like 1948.
|
The photo is definitely vintage/period (you can see the silvering), but I don't know that it was made from the origal negative. None the less, either way it's a great and valuable photo.
No knowledge or input on the signature. |
double post
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:00 PM. |