![]() |
Mob Mentality On Chatboards
There are some really cool guys here. Knowledgeable and fun to "collect with".
I see great looking cards and enjoy the many stories. I even like the owner of the forums and think he's intelligent and wants a better hobby experience for himself and net users. I have had many private conversations that are super positive. With that said, there is a mob mentality that the TPG scandals have created that should be checked. It was already in my mind as I read an inordinate amount of card threads hijacked with "45/45" silliness and accusations that cards are trimmed that show no evidence)other than scan angle/shadows. One centered around a '64 Rose recently where guys just jumped on it saying the card was trimmed, etc. I would wager your whole collection against mine the card wasn't altered in any way. Stock thread appeared evident in any areas of question...yet we had "that doesn't look right" and "45/45" and "too much room in the holder" ridiculousness. When a card is truly small, you need to actually MOVE the card to see how it plays. An image shows nothing. In addition, the holders themselves have a margin of sizing distortions that are negligible, but noteworthy when bordering a 2.5x3.5" piece of cardboard. Today, I was happy to share my '77 Yount. It is a beautiful, vending-fresh card that is spectacular. I wanted to show it off to pad my fragile geek card collector ego--just like EVERYONE here. I'm confident to have handled more 77's than anyone on earth and I know the card's vending case origin...yet nobody even gave me the "hey, sweet card"... but one incorrigible nuisance immediately chimed "45/45 centering"...I am typically much nicer in writing than I am in person--which is quite different from the norm so I'll leave it at that. I realize some baseball card collectors have never spoken to a woman without first giving her their credit card information but PLEASE guys...for the love of all things pack-fresh...STOP the trimming witch hunt. Not everything you don't have is trimmed. Now....attack! |
I saw that and thought the poster was just goofing.
|
He was joking. It's why I put "ha-ha" when I'm joking. It ruins the joke, but I'm sort of an anti-comedy-comedy fan, like Andy Kaufman wrestling. ha-ha...Rob
|
I think a lot of people are very down on grading right now, for obvious reasons.
A lot of even mid grade cards have been altered, and none of the grading companies seem to be able to tell, which is their job. That added to how much money some have probably lost probably makes people a bit afraid and cynical. FWIW, the Yount looks really good to me. All the late 70's Topps are difficult with nice centering. I've gone through loads of them too, more 78-81, but lots. I did some set building from vending for a dealer. Maybe 100,000 78's? I don't really recall just how many sets I put together for them. I do know with the way I sorted, I had no sets assembled then the offered a bonus for whoever could fill a 25 set order first. It didn't take me long at all as I had a deskfull of 100 card sections of sets. In 25K 81's I had only maybe 150-200 were nice enough to even consider grading. |
2 Attachment(s)
Here's a BVG 9 on eBay for $70 and a PSA 10 for $7650 I collected these from packs as a kid. There are a lot of 1977 Topps out there. I like nice looking 9's for under $100. I don't really understand the "10" designation. It's not an attack, just an observation and opinion about 1970's era Topps cards...Rob
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Phil, I was joking. Between the two big grins and agreeing with you in the Rose thread, I thought you would notice. Not only that, but it's not the only thread where I've addressed you and appreciated your input (the other being my recent '52 Topps one).
But I'm not joking now when I say that I can't believe how uptight and negative some people are on those boards, and how quick they are to assume the worst. |
Quote:
I don't buy graded cards. But I agree. If I was trying to show off a card, and someone jumped in about possible flaws, that would be a real downer. I do like the monthly pickup threads, however. Those always seem to be rather positive places to post. |
It's just 3 or 4 jerk offs that have nothing better to do than "inform" the board about the scandal and voice their "opinion" over and over. I've added them to my ignore list, but people still quote their lunacy.
I can only hope they break some of the board's very few covenants and are banned for life. It would make for a much more pleasurable forum. At this point, I dont think anyone is turning a blind eye to trimmed cards in holders, but enough is enough already. They arent posting any new revelations or insight to the matter and add nothing to the board. |
Not trying to be a jerk because I can sympathize but when you start a thread, you invite people to comment. You take the good with the bad.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Don't be so sensitive, you shared a 1977 Robin Yount card. People share WAY better cards/items with out getting the WOW replies.;):rolleyes:
|
Quote:
I once was the foreman on a jury. The gentlemen in question clearly committed all three offenses against the law of which he was accused. However, in coming to a consensus as a jury, there was one abstaining vote on one of the charges. Through lengthy, but thoughtful discussion, we finally found the heart of the concept and the verbiage by which the rest of us understood that juror's point, and reticence to convict on that charge. He was right. What had seemed so clear to the rest of us initially, through further examination, wasn't so cut and dried in the language of the law. Yes, he clearly did it, but in the language of the law it could not be deemed a certainty. It was a powerful moment, and one which I always try to remember when my opinion perhaps differs from others. I wish others would have a moment like that. |
Yeah i said theres room in the holder and I didn't like the top right edge and was called crazy lol.
I mean he asked for opinions which were given. Then he kinda lost his mind a little. He said he had a similar response about a video game he posted....Maybe the interweb is not the place for him idk. Sent from my SM-N960U using Tapatalk |
When someone asks which one do you prefer, why shouldn't size matter? That is the first thing I look at over centering, corners, etc. I measure cards that I buy to make sure they are the correct size. This is the hobby we live in. It has been created by grading companies and certain dealers. However, I have been measuring cards since the 80s, so it really isn't all that new, just in the headlines lately.
|
Quote:
And then there is the other guy who is like a rottweiler on LSD. When he sees someone enjoying the hobby, he charges right at that person and bites him on the leg. There are people who don't even want to post on here anymore because of him. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not a registry guy--not even a little. Certain 70's cards may offer more of a challenge to a discerning collector than you might be aware. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Phil, as I'm sure you're aware I was also joking. Your Yount is gorgeous. I agree that people are way too quick to jump to conclusions. It's absurd.
|
I think you could argue that about any era though, no?
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Mob Mentality On Chatboards
It’s hard to blame people for being paranoid about grading, and PSA in particular at the moment. I can see where the mob mentality creeps in particularly with so many unanswered questions.
And the sketchiness with PSA is not just limited to the alteration topic. Checkout Vintage Card Curator on YouTube, and his “discovery videos” about PSA bias, for example how rarely they give 10’s to key cards in lieu of 9’s in comparison to other cards in the set. I’ve seen enough stuff like that lately to make me pretty sour on grading in general, before even worrying that a particular card is altered. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
You clearly missed my point. "OMG he mentioned a video game?!?!". I was trying to illustrate that people in these threads jump to conclusions, just to sound smart a lot of times, IMO. That was me losing my mind?
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:22 AM. |