![]() |
Small Cracker Jack find - my first
Last month I flew to central Montana for a family visit. While we were all together, my aunt and mother in law were going though some of my grandmother's old albums. My MIL, who knows I like old baseball cards, called me over and said "Here's something you might want to see." She showed me one page from the album:
https://i.imgur.com/lbQJRCO_d.jpg?ma...idelity=medium Then another: https://i.imgur.com/lvyzdla_d.jpg?ma...idelity=medium And then: https://i.imgur.com/pUXAk0V_d.jpg?ma...idelity=medium I was dumbfounded. I've always read about cards in scrapbooks but never had the fortune to see any first-hand. And nice cards too! Not the top stars from the set, but a couple Hall of Famers, and a hall of shamer too...:D I was especially thrilled that they were something from the family. I don't have any other family cards, unless you count my brother's 1977 Eddie Murray rookie...:rolleyes: We're not totally sure who put the scrapbook together, but it spans the teens through the 50s and mostly contains recipes, news articles, etc. These are the only sports cards. I'd love to know their story - this part of Montana 100 years ago was very rural and remote, so a box of Cracker Jacks would have been a real treat. Condition-wise, I was impressed by how clean and new some of the cards look, almost like they went straight from the box into the scrapbook. Four are crease free. On the downside, they're securely glued to the pages, and someone penciled in other names on the tops of each card. I was thrilled that my aunt and uncle let me take them home, but they aren't going to win any grading contests. I don't know much about the Cracker Jack sets. Please enlighten me! Someone snuck a peek at the back of Rickey and it's printed upside down, so at least that one is from 1915, right? I assume the rest are as well, but they slightly wrinkled the card in the process and I almost died. Someone else dinged a corner on the Maranville as well - people stop picking at them! :eek: - so I put them away before anyone else got any bright ideas. I would appreciate opinions and advice on how best to preserve and protect these. I won't mess with the pencil marks, but I would consider removing the cards from the pages. I have soaked scrapbook paper off a few t-cards with good success before, but not Cracker Jacks. Has anyone had luck removing these? Did I read that soaking makes the red bleed into the borders? I know different glues react differently to water, and I thought I could test the glue by trying to soak off one of the non sports cards first. Is it worth contacting a professional conservator for help? Any recommendations? Or maybe I'll just leave the cards on the pages. They do make a nice display, and keeping them together preserves their history as a group. Either way, I have no intention to sell them. They are special and I'd like the cards to stay in the family. Thanks for your input and expertise. I always learn something when I come here. Have a great day and happy collecting. Cards are still out there! Mike |
You've got 4 Hall of Famers plus Cicotte out of the 8 cards. Nice!
You should be able to soak those cards off the pages, if you know what you're doing. I would start with the Evans, since it's a common and in the worst shape of the lot, and see how it goes. Here is a post I made a few years ago about how to soak cards: http://net54baseball.com/showpost.ph...70&postcount=7 |
CJs
What a great story and find for you, congrats. The family element certainly adds a glow to it!
|
Very cool!
|
Cool!
I would suggest not soaking the cards and keep and display them as is, maybe having the pages added together in a large frame. This is the way they were originally kept by your family for over a century, keep that heirloom intact for future generations. Brent |
Personally, me...I would make money off that/those.
Just saying :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'd imagine a good soaking would loosen the glue and they would detach easily from the scrapbook pages. I'd leave them the way they are if they were mine though. Great find!
|
If it were just a random pickup of some scrapbook sheets, I would have no issue with soaking them. But if they were owned by a family member, I would want to keep them as is, and perhaps frame them as mentioned by others.
Brian |
Thanks to everyone for the responses and advice! I really appreciate it. I am leaning towards leaving them as is, for now at least. Fortunately, I'm not in any hurry. If I do decide to liberate them, I'll post my results here. If I frame them, I'll share that as well.
One thing I want to investigate is the names penciled in on the borders. Initially I thought they might be the players' first names, but that's not the case. Most of what's written is full names I don't recognize: Chester Larsen, Frank W., etc. My guess is that the owner wrote his friends' names on the cards, but given how few people lived (and still live) out that direction, it shouldn't be too hard to figure out. If I find out more I'll share it here. |
Congrats on the find.
It's interesting to note that on the same board members are talking about cards that have been presumably soaked, cleaned up, and bumped a couple of grades being the biggest scandal in our hobby's history. And in this threads others are giving advice on how to do it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
A decent percent of vintage cards would still be in scrapbooks without someone soaking them out at some point. A very common practice in play for decades in the hobby that, in the vast majority of the cases, was not meant to deceive...how else are you going to see the back side?
A card was more likely to keep its fresh new look if it was stored in a scrapbook compared to other storage options. I imagine a large chunk of the legitimate top condition vintage cards had a good soak to separate them from scrapbook paper...and I see nothing wrong with it. Brian |
Quote:
Is soaking ok for scrap book removal, but not stain removal? Where do we draw the line? Will PWCC's conservation definition become the industry standard? Will PSA update the definition of altered? Lots of interesting unanswered questions right now. |
First off to the OP I have to say it is an amazing find. Regardless of players just finding CJ’s in a scrapbook would be an adrenaline rush. Huge Congrats on a nice find of good looking CJ’s. When it comes to vintage cards, Sometimes perfection has errors. Happy collecting.
Soaking a scrapbook page to loosen cards has been done forever in the hobby from the most trusted names to the guys shady as fuq. If it doesn’t come off with plain water then it’s permanent. If you use chemicals or other bio agents to clean, remove, or alter the card in any way then it’s altered. If the OP decided to soak those cards I would think the black card stock would wreak havoc on the card. Maybe add drops of water to the back of the stock and allow time to soak through. Hopefully once the area is damp, Not Saturated, the card will pop right off and the glue will dry fairly quickly. I would suggest good ole card savers and penny sleeves for storage over grading. If you feel the need to soak and rinse I guess you could. Removing the glue with plain water won’t remove the stain it made and it won’t adversely effect the card in any way it hasn’t already by leaving it on there and not soaking it. You Can’t Soak Away Age in a card with plain water. I can promise you it is impossible without the aid of something additional. If those cards go into a bath to soak it could also leave a film residue on them from the glue breaking down. Not to mention the cards would be more prone to foxing and discoloring after prolonged soaks. It’s reminds me of the “Take this pill to fix your issue. Take these three to fix the side effects from that one”. |
Just wondering. Those cjs are wafer thin and very fragile. Would they hold up to a soak?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=169988 |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:39 AM. |