Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Photographs that Ken Burns missed (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=263619)

PafkoattheWall 12-22-2018 03:38 PM

Photographs that Ken Burns missed
 
Ken Burns did a remarkably good job finding great photographs in private and public collections, but I’m sure he missed a lot. If Burns were filming today, which of your photographs would you suggest he use?

batsballsbases 12-22-2018 06:29 PM

James,
I will take a shot at this a little. Photography sometimes is in the eye of the beholder, I have owned and sold many great photos that some people might not even give a second look at. Everyone looks at a photo in a different way. I.E content, structure, importance, historical it all adds up to what makes a photo great. I do hope some of the collectors on the site chime in with their comments about this subject. We have some very knowledgeable photo collectors on this board. As for Ken Burns he is paid to do what he does which sometimes puts great pressure on what he puts into his documentaries. Here is one photo in my collection I have loved from the day I got it, I wouldnt say its super rare or pricey but I love the content and image....

lumberjack 12-22-2018 06:48 PM

ken burns
 
One thing for sure, as there wasn't a lot of decent film of early 20th century baseball, Burns wanted images that they could pan across in order to give the illusion of motion.

They used a few pictures from my collection. I had this astounding photo of Joe Jackson in street clothes holding a trophy. Once in a while you see that pic in an auction. I thought, "How can they not use this?" But they didn't. It was too static an image, I guess.

You would have to ask Ken Burns, but that's my take on what made for good television.
lumberjack

sphere and ash 12-22-2018 08:22 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I’ve always liked this image of JFK throwing out the first pitch. It’s by Robert Riger, who just may be the most underappreciated photographer in baseball history. Riger was arguably the best baseball photographer of all the Sports Illustrated photographers, but no one collects him. I have to imagine that will change.

Leon 12-23-2018 08:27 AM

FYI the original poster of this thread has been suspended for bad registration info. The registration I received says it's a girl? I have never known a girl with James as a name. After an unreturned email questioning that issue the suspension was done.

mr2686 12-23-2018 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1838939)
FYI the original poster of this thread has been suspended for bad registration info. The registration I received says it's a girl? I have never known a girl with James as a name. After an unreturned email questioning that issue the suspension was done.

Maybe he just throws like a girl. :eek:

RichardSimon 12-23-2018 09:02 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Rough shape I know but this is the Polo Grounds Giants-Cubs playoff game in 1908.

sphere and ash 12-23-2018 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardSimon (Post 1838945)
Rough shape I know but this is the Polo Grounds Giants-Cubs playoff game in 1908.

For many years, I’ve collected Merkle-related memorabilia, including photographs of the playoff game. I’ve never seen this one. You can feel the crowd. Fantastic.

Leon 12-23-2018 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr2686 (Post 1838944)
Maybe he just throws like a girl. :eek:

Probably. I would never admit to throwing like a girl either.
I don't understand some people. It's not like you HAVE to have your real name out here but what won't be allowed is a member having a fake name on the board and/or in their registration.

Peter_Spaeth 12-23-2018 10:21 AM

Out, out brief candle.

batsballsbases 12-23-2018 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1838939)
FYI the original poster of this thread has been suspended for bad registration info. The registration I received says it's a girl? I have never known a girl with James as a name. After an unreturned email questioning that issue the suspension was done.

Thats to bad the question really wasnt that bad! I liked the subject!:D:D

Leon 12-23-2018 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by batsballsbases (Post 1838974)
Thats to bad the question really wasnt that bad! I liked the subject!:D:D

I agree wholeheartedly. But we won't allow a fake name on the board and/or on registration. Now if this person, presumably a girl, emails back and takes out the name under their id, then no issue on reinstatement.

batsballsbases 12-23-2018 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 1838975)
I agree wholeheartedly. But we won't allow a fake name on the board and/or on registration. Now if this person, presumably a girl, emails back and takes out the name under their id, then no issue on reinstatement.

++ I Agree Leon!

perezfan 12-23-2018 02:15 PM

I would say Burns missed the mark on Larry Doby and others who immediately followed Robinson.

The series focused almost as much on integration and Jackie Robinson as it did on Baseball itself. But the other African American "pioneers" garnered only a brief mention. Many of them followed Jackie's footsteps by a mere few weeks, and faced similar hatred and racial issues. But you wouldn't know it, based on the way it was portrayed.

I don't have any good photos to share, but hope this addresses the OP's question... man, woman, transgender, or otherwise.

Scott Garner 12-23-2018 07:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardSimon (Post 1838945)
Rough shape I know but this is the Polo Grounds Giants-Cubs playoff game in 1908.

Incredible photo!

lumberjack 12-24-2018 08:02 PM

polo grounds playoff photo
 
At first, I thought those people were standing on Coogan's Bluff, but after looking at the photo for a moment, I realized there were about 200 fans on the roof of that firetrap.

For the life of me, I can't understand how the ball club was able to pull that off.
lumberjack


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:52 AM.