Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Collecting 1953 and 1955 Topps (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=258072)

jasonc 07-30-2018 02:45 AM

Collecting 1953 and 1955 Topps
 
It's nice to collect the whole set of some of the early to mid 50's sets, but there are missing star cards. Is there anybody else that thinks If I was to collect 1953 and 1955 topps, I would get some great looking cards (Probably two of the best looking sets) and excellent player selection. I know most people would say just go for 1956, but I've done that one already and want to try for a different set/sets.

I noticed the key missing star cards from 1955: Feller, Reese, Mantle, Campanella, Ford are all in 1953.

You get a second year, Aaron, Kaline and Banks; plus, Clemente, Killebrew and Koufax rookies from 1955.

rats60 07-30-2018 06:29 AM

There are missing stars from 1956 Topps too. There is no Stan Musial card. The 1958 Topps set is the closest to what we would consider complete, but players like Jackie Robinson had retired by then. I would go ahead and collect the 1955 Topps set. It has 3 great rookies and 3 great 2nd year cards. Plus it has the best design in my opinion. The design was so good that they copied it again in 1956. The hobby continues to put emphasis on rookie cards and the 1953 Topps set has none, just the iconic Mantle card.

hcv123 07-30-2018 07:41 AM

Ditto
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rats60 (Post 1799191)
There are missing stars from 1956 Topps too. There is no Stan Musial card. The 1958 Topps set is the closest to what we would consider complete, but players like Jackie Robinson had retired by then. I would go ahead and collect the 1955 Topps set. It has 3 great rookies and 3 great 2nd year cards. Plus it has the best design in my opinion. The design was so good that they copied it again in 1956. The hobby continues to put emphasis on rookie cards and the 1953 Topps set has none, just the iconic Mantle card.

What he said. 1955 is AWESOME!

ALR-bishop 07-30-2018 07:42 AM

I like all 3 of the sets you mention, but since you did 56, the 53 verticle format might be a change of pace

vintagebaseballcardguy 07-30-2018 09:15 AM

I love all three sets and want them all eventually in mid grade. Currently, I have 1953, and it is my favorite! I am close to having 1954 finished, with 1955 and 1956 up next.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

sickmantz 08-01-2018 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jasonc (Post 1799180)
It's nice to collect the whole set of some of the early to mid 50's sets, but there are missing star cards. Is there anybody else that thinks If I was to collect 1953 and 1955 topps, I would get some great looking cards (Probably two of the best looking sets) and excellent player selection. I know most people would say just go for 1956, but I've done that one already and want to try for a different set/sets.

I noticed the key missing star cards from 1955: Feller, Reese, Mantle, Campanella, Ford are all in 1953.

You get a second year, Aaron, Kaline and Banks; plus, Clemente, Killebrew and Koufax rookies from 1955.

Isn't '55 too similar to '56 if you're trying to do something different?

jasonc 08-02-2018 04:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sickmantz (Post 1799868)
Isn't '55 too similar to '56 if you're trying to do something different?

Heh.. That's a good point. Actually, I do not have the 1956 anymore, if I did then that is something I would consider and maybe do 1953 and 1954.

Robert, good point, it is certainly a nice contrast to have 1953, 1954 and 1955 sets, you get iconic players, rookies, and different card styles on those 3 sets.

vintagebaseballcardguy 08-02-2018 05:00 AM

Jason, '53 and '54 are sweet! I wouldn't mind building '55 and '56, too. They're all awesome! You just can't go wrong.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

kailes2872 08-03-2018 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vintagebaseballcardguy (Post 1799928)
Jason, '53 and '54 are sweet! I wouldn't mind building '55 and '56, too. They're all awesome! You just can't go wrong.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

No doubt - I love all four sets! It just goes to show how great the product can be when competition is fierce.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:54 PM.