![]() |
Thread No Longer Needed
Thread No Longer Needed
|
pretty surprising results -
Several of the classic "hobby favorites" didn't fair so well; e.g., 1953 Bowman, 1957 Topps, etc. |
'83 over '73? C'mon.
|
I think bracketing by years really hurt this one. Seeding 1952 Topps, 1933 Goudey, and T206 in the same regional was a mistake. There should have been a ranking system used first...
|
Quote:
Next year, there will be conference/decade tournaments so sets can compete to get into the main tournament. This way we can do some sort of real seeding. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
60 over 59??? PUHLEEEEZE
|
I want to watch the NIT where the ‘33 DeLongs stomp all over 89 Topps
|
Quote:
|
89 Upper Deck is down and 56 Topps jumped out to an early lead on 52 Topps.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:43 PM. |