Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Help me pick my next card (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=251302)

T_Hamilton 02-14-2018 11:06 AM

Help me pick my next card
 
In between a 1914 Cracker Jack Ty Cobb PSA 1 (or 2) or a E90-1 Joe Jackson PSA 1. Any opinions? I am having trouble deciding.

Thanks guys!

Taylor

sycks22 02-14-2018 11:06 AM

Jackson. Those huge lips make me laugh

ullmandds 02-14-2018 11:07 AM

Cobby...its cheaper and much better looking.

darwinbulldog 02-14-2018 11:10 AM

Cobb.

joshuanip 02-14-2018 11:12 AM

Cobb, only cause I love cracker jacks. And Cobb.

KMayUSA6060 02-14-2018 11:18 AM

Cobb. Cracker Jacks are legendary.

oldjudge 02-14-2018 11:27 AM

Neither. The Jackson card is ugly and if you want a nice Cobb buy a higher grade M101-4 with the same money.

brian1961 02-14-2018 11:30 AM

Taylor,

The Cracker Jack Ty Cobb is one of Ty's best-looking cards, period. There's no mistaking the image----it's Ty Cobb all right. Furthermore, he's lookin' right atcha---priceless.

With the E90-1 Joe Jackson, sad to say, you really cannot tell if it's Joe, or somebody that maybe, kinda, sorta looks like Mr. Jackson. Off hand, I don't know if this one is his rookie card, since I'm not collecting pre-war, nor do I have "Gotta have it rookie-itis", but again, but if you have this collector focus craze in your system, you better go with Joe Jackson.

Think it through, and get the one that will make you most happy and content.

--- Brian Powell

T_Hamilton 02-14-2018 11:32 AM

Appreciate all the comments so far. I am leaning Cobb. Already have the T3, D304 and a T206 bat off in the collection. No JJ's in the collection yet, so that's why there is interest in the E90-1.

iowadoc77 02-14-2018 11:36 AM

C.o.b.b.

packs 02-14-2018 11:42 AM

I don't know why anyone would really chase that Jackson card. It's horrible.

MR RAREBACK 02-14-2018 12:04 PM

cobb

njdunkin1 02-14-2018 12:07 PM

I'm partial to the Jackson just because I really like the pose. It makes me giggle. However, I'm not a Cracker Jack guy in any respect (*gasp* :)), but I feel like both are an equal investment opportunity. Go with your gut and whichever one you would rather display.

yanksfan09 02-14-2018 12:27 PM

Cobb

rats60 02-14-2018 12:27 PM

Cobb

Fistner10 02-14-2018 05:06 PM

Jackson, one of fav cards. Wish I could afford it!

Sean 02-14-2018 06:24 PM

Have you ruled out a CJ Jackson? It's a much better image of Joe, and you already have the other Cobbs.

Econteachert205 02-14-2018 06:39 PM

Buy the Cobb (screaming wildly). To me it is THE Cobb to have, though I'm sure I'm in the minority. I think it's the best card in the cj set. Also in the minority.

Piratedogcardshows 02-14-2018 07:38 PM

My choice would be Cobb as well. Great pose and grip on the bat.

TUM301 02-15-2018 04:48 AM

Joe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sean (Post 1748130)
Have you ruled out a CJ Jackson? It's a much better image of Joe, and you already have the other Cobbs.

I know, and the board has discussed it often, that the C J Jackson has taken off but if possible that`s the way I`d lean. It wasn`t one of the stated options but that J J card is among the top 5 all timers I M O. Best of luck and great "problem" to wrestle with my friend.

iowadoc77 02-15-2018 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TUM301 (Post 1748209)
I know, and the board has discussed it often, that the C J Jackson has taken off but if possible that`s the way I`d lean. It wasn`t one of the stated options but that J J card is among the top 5 all timers I M O. Best of luck and great "problem" to wrestle with my friend.

Agreed. The real question here is should you get something awesome or awesomer! Win win either way but the esthetics of the CJs are vastly superior in my opinion.

pcoz 02-15-2018 05:41 AM

Jax RC
 
CJ's are legendary, but a Shoeless Joe RC for me!!

iwantitiwinit 02-15-2018 05:43 AM

Cobb and stretch for the psa 2 if possible.

bauce 02-15-2018 08:50 AM

Any Nick Foles RC.

But seriously, maybe you can find a nice Jackson graded A? May be trimmed, but the eye appeal should be there.

Luke 02-15-2018 11:10 AM

If you're considering Jackson, I'd go for the 1916 m101-4 or 1917 e135 or Boston Store.

T_Hamilton 02-15-2018 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Luke (Post 1748312)
If you're considering Jackson, I'd go for the 1916 m101-4 or 1917 e135 or Boston Store.

You think the e135 or boston store can be had for ~$10k?

Leon 02-17-2018 03:15 PM

Never a big fan of that Jackson so it's Cobb for my vote.

.

Touch'EmAll 02-17-2018 04:51 PM

imo, the e90-1 Jax is just not a visually appealing card. Go Cobb. Or go off the board and get a nice T206, maybe Matty or Johnson.

pawpawdiv9 02-18-2018 11:11 AM

No doubt a CrackerJack.
I love my 1915 CJ Joe Jackson so much that it has me looking into a CJ Cobb and Wagner and my eyes drooled over that Matthewson that sold recently.
Go with the CJ Cobb!!!!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:22 PM.