![]() |
Photograph- Back Stamp HELP
1 Attachment(s)
There’s a photograph that I like that has this back stamp on the reverse and I wanted to get some expert, or even more experience with photos than me, advice. Is this a more modern stamping or what period is it from. I know Wingfield took a lot of photos, but unsure if this is just a relatively recent stamp or period. Any help would be great.
|
Stamping consistent with Type 2 1970's re-strikes from original negatives.
|
Photograph
Dewey,
Thanks for the information. The seller is describing the photograph as a ‘50’s photo, which I think it’s an early ‘60’s shot, but wondered if it was period or not. A Type 2 is fine with me as well, but didn’t want to pay asking price for a non Type 1. Possibly make an offer and see how it turns out. |
Has anyone ever created a dating guide for back stamps? I think it would be a great resource.
|
Quote:
According to Fogel et al, the stamping in the image above is very similar to Wingfield's period originals, but the "n" in News is the giveaway to it being a 70's reissue. Type I stamp looks like this. Very similar. |
Be careful, John Rogers faked the later "restrike" version of Don Wingfield's stamp. If the paper is glossy, I would stay away to be safe unless its really cheap. He had access to Wingfield's negatives through the Sporting News archive and made fake stamps so whether its a 1970's re-strike or a 2012 JR special (still technically a type 2) all comes down to the age of the paper.
|
Quote:
On a side note I look forward to receiving the Brooksie picture from a recent auction 😃 |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:06 PM. |