![]() |
Net54baseball Contest (9/27/17) - Immediate- $37.77
1 Attachment(s)
Here will be a fun little contest and we'll see how long it takes to answer. In the current thread on the Sotheby's Copeland sale (great read btw) there is a glaring error. First one to post what it is wins. Good luck to all!!
There is 1 answer that will be obvious when pointed out. ps....had to add a crazy picture for the heck of it. **Also, the prize is going to change periodically and whomever guesses correct will win the prize at that time. . |
Is it the measurement of the Wagner? It's stated as 1 7/16" by 2 5/8", which would be the standard T206 measurement. However, that Wagner was trimmed so it technically shouldn't measure properly.
|
Quote:
|
T206 Honus Wagner is described as "the rarest and most coveted card in existence."
|
Quote:
|
is it 'Nodgrass' error? - I do not recall hearing of that one before.
Got it...I think... Post 1990 Tobacco Baseball Issues, lots 184-238. |
Quote:
|
The Wagner was not the first card graded by PSA?
|
Quote:
|
"This included the Wagner, which Copeland bought from Mastro in 1988 for $110,000..."
This happened in 1987, not 1988. |
My guess
Wasn't Lelands around then? They could have handled it.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I here bye label myself as stupid :eek:...in this instance. |
It says that the T206 set has 520 cards, missing only 3 (which were sold individually), when the set actually has 524 cards?
|
Quote:
I will give a hint in a little while if no one gets it. It really is a good one.... |
Wagner circa 1910
wouldn't 1909 be more accurate for the 150 series? |
Quote:
|
You can't get much more circa 1910 than 1909.
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Is it the full set of 520 cards missing only the "big 3?' By the time of this auction, the Doyle error I guess was collector knowledge.
|
Ooops, I missed Nat's answer, carry on.
|
Leon, I doubt this is the "glaring error" you are looking for, but the T213 Coupon cards with the "16 for 10 cts." back were issued in 1919, not 1914 as stated by Sotheby's. Do I receive a consolation prize?
|
How about the T213-2 cobb "a vertical printer's crease is common"? I don't recall seeing many coupons with a vertical crease like the e105s
|
Quote:
|
Leon, I believe I now see the "glaring error." The pics of many of the cards are identified by an incorrect ACC number!
Whoops, my bad! These are lot numbers, not ACC numbers. A perfect example of an old man's brain freeze! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
None of the answers are correct so far so maybe it isn't that glaring? But it could be chatter fodder when found out. |
lorillard cards from 1886?
|
Quote:
..hint, this could be nefarious.... |
How about 1888 Kalamazoo Bats, not 1887?
|
Quote:
|
Under Order of Sale
Post 1990 Tobacco Baseball Issues, Lots 184-238 |
Quote:
|
Quote:
remember the last hint...... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
bb card collecting is the most popular hobby in the world????
|
Quote:
|
Mastro sold the card in 1987 not 1988.
|
Quote:
|
I know the answer, but am waiting for the prize to drop to $0.77.
|
On the Wagner, the description lists Pittsburgh, but the card is Pittsburg?
|
is it the comment that states he did not approve of smoking and that is why the cards were pulled? From what i understand, he did not want to have children have to buy tobacco products to get his card.
|
T206 Wagner has a yellow background on the cover
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If repeat guesses aren't allowed ignore this, but we're not making much progress even when we know which listing it's about. T206 museum says that there are three Piedmont Wagners, not two? I mean, that's not a glaring mistake, but apparently neither is whatever Leon noticed.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 PM. |