Opinions needed for my set
 

Hi,
I would love your guys opinions as I'm trying to decide which is best between the following 2 cards for my signed 1954 set. One card has a bold sig but also has a crease through the middle while the other is like NM but has a faded auto. If it was you guys, which one would you keep for the set?



Thanks,
Dan

It's an autograph set - I vote the strong signature!

+1. No question

Thanks guys! Thats where I was leaning as well, but my mind got the best of me and I ended up staring at the two cards forever going back and forth. As I buy lots that have a card I need I also upgrade the cards in my set as I'm trying to get as few cards with creases as possible but I also want strong signatures.

Another vote for the strong signature.

same here. strong sig

I also vote for the card on the left. Stronger signature.

You want the bold signature. That fading signature won't get any better, and will eventually fade out. You'll be buying the same bold signature card you can now....

Strong Signature


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Strong signature.

echo strong sig,

Def strong sig!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It seems unanimous, which is quite uncommon around these parts. I concur. ;)

I hate to agree with everyone, so I abstain.

This is the first unanimous vote I've ever seen on Net54!

Someone better check The Underworld for signs of ice!


Steve

Buy both :)

Please...
 

.....go with that bold, nice, strong signature....the crease is not important !! In my opinion. It is a good pick up!!!!!

Jumping on the strong signature band wagon!

I vote moving this to the Post War or Autograph section.....JUST KIDDING:D