Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   SOLD: 1948-49 Leaf Jackie Robinson PSA 7 (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=226456)

calvindog 08-05-2016 07:46 AM

SOLD: 1948-49 Leaf Jackie Robinson PSA 7
 
Perfectly centered, fantastic card. As the prices are all over the place, I'm willing to listen to offers. Please no offers from the usual used car salesmen on the board.

<a data-flickr-embed="true" href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/2909606017/in/album-72157607704019548/" title="1948-49 Leaf"><img src="https://c2.staticflickr.com/4/3056/2909606017_884b4115d0_z.jpg?zz&#x3D;1" width="377" height="640" alt="1948-49 Leaf"></a><script async src="//embedr.flickr.com/assets/client-code.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

jfkheat 08-05-2016 10:08 AM

Very nice card but shouldn't it be 1948 Leaf?
James

1952boyntoncollector 08-05-2016 10:52 AM

i pretty sure these cards were made in 48 and 49 and theres a bowman card people also list a 'rookie' I just checked ebay and didnt see any 1949s on the leaf flip.....but its an early flip and thats why...interesting..

also you may want to put a price on the card if you already have a price in mind if you want to save the used car offers..but thats up to you

aloondilana 08-05-2016 06:09 PM

Jackie
 
Hi Jeffrey,
I'd be interested in the 14k range.
John

Stonepony 08-05-2016 07:28 PM

That's a beautiful card

uniship 08-05-2016 07:55 PM

Love that card
 
Incredible card Jeff.

calvindog 08-06-2016 07:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aloondilana (Post 1568812)
Hi Jeffrey,
I'd be interested in the 14k range.
John

John,

I sent you a pm.

Jeff

calvindog 08-06-2016 07:26 AM

And thanks all for the kind words on the card!

ronniehatesjazz 08-06-2016 08:33 AM

Amazing card! A little outside of my range however maybe I'll sell a kidney or something and come up with the cash lol.

Snapolit1 08-06-2016 08:37 AM

Beauty.

pclpads 08-06-2016 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronniehatesjazz (Post 1568956)
Amazing card! A little outside of my range however maybe I'll sell a kidney or something and come up with the cash lol.

Plan on selling both + your liver. :D

1952boyntoncollector 08-06-2016 12:32 PM

i sent a pm too.no response yet

ronniehatesjazz 08-07-2016 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pclpads (Post 1569006)
Plan on selling both + your liver. :D

Unfortunately, my craft beer addiction has made the the thing worthless I'm afraid. Maybe someone will take pity on me though lol.

tedzan 08-20-2016 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1568624)
i pretty sure these cards were made in 48 and 49 and theres a bowman card people also list a 'rookie' I just checked ebay and didnt see any 1949s on the leaf flip.....but its an early flip and thats why...interesting..

also you may want to put a price on the card if you already have a price in mind if you want to save the used car offers..but thats up to you


Hey Jake

What makes you "pretty sure" that the LEAF BB cards were "made in 48 and 49" ?

Did you collect them in 1948 ? ?


The LEAF's were my first color BB cards that I collected as a kid in 1949. These cards were NEVER issued in 1948 !

FYI......read my 8-page 1949 LEAF Baseball article in Issue #9 of the Old Cardboard magazine.


TED Z
.

Neal 08-21-2016 08:43 AM

Beautiful card!

Is PSA slabbing these as 1949 now?

1952boyntoncollector 08-25-2016 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tedzan (Post 1574891)
Hey Jake

What makes you "pretty sure" that the LEAF BB cards were "made in 48 and 49" ?

Did you collect them in 1948 ? ?


The LEAF's were my first color BB cards that I collected as a kid in 1949. These cards were NEVER issued in 1948 !

FYI......read my 8-page 1949 LEAF Baseball article in Issue #9 of the Old Cardboard magazine.


TED Z
.


Hence the 'pretty sure', however I meant as far as the way the cards are treated in the category. Ie. how to call the card.

1989 topps cards could be made in 1990 as well but as far as what year you call the card a 1990 topps card

Afterall, it isnt unusual for a Leaf rookie with psa to say 1948..see the link

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1948-LEAF-79...QAAOSwepJXYqHA

The point i was making was that 1949 bowmans Jackies are not called rookie cards (maybe they were made in 1950) as opposed to 1948 leaf jackies. Given that the leaf jackies would be 1949s, i would think the 1949 bowmans would be just as much as a rookie card?

So i mentioned that they were 1948 or 1949. I believe there was literature out there about whether to call these cards 1948 or 1949 is what made me say pretty sure..I used to wrong choice of words as 'made' but i do believe there is a debate whether to call the card a 1948 or 1949 which is important when there is a 1949 bowman out there

rats60 08-26-2016 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector (Post 1576846)
Hence the 'pretty sure', however I meant as far as the way the cards are treated in the category. Ie. how to call the card.

1989 topps cards could be made in 1990 as well but as far as what year you call the card a 1990 topps card

Afterall, it isnt unusual for a Leaf rookie with psa to say 1948..see the link

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1948-LEAF-79...QAAOSwepJXYqHA

The point i was making was that 1949 bowmans Jackies are not called rookie cards (maybe they were made in 1950) as opposed to 1948 leaf jackies. Given that the leaf jackies would be 1949s, i would think the 1949 bowmans would be just as much as a rookie card?

So i mentioned that they were 1948 or 1949. I believe there was literature out there about whether to call these cards 1948 or 1949 is what made me say pretty sure..I used to wrong choice of words as 'made' but i do believe there is a debate whether to call the card a 1948 or 1949 which is important when there is a 1949 bowman out there

The confusion on the year of Leafs is some are copyrighted 1948 and 1949. The Jackie has a 1949 copywrite, so it is definitely a 1949 card as is the Bowman. They are both rookie cards.

The problem is that we have no evidence that the cards were ever issued in 48. The only collector testimony from people like Ted or Lionel Carter is that they collected the cards in 1949. Many of the cards contain stats from the 1948 season, include the Jackie Robinson and Stan Musial cards, so that dates them as 1949, meaning the Leaf Musial is not a rookie card. Also it is very likely, from collector testimony, that the Bowman Jackie was even released before the Leaf.

With the stats from the season on the back of the cards, the only possibility is there were some issued in November and December of 1948. However, Leaf also issued a football set. So, the idea that a brand new company would issue a football set in season and a baseball set out of season is extremely unlikely. We know these cards were aimed at kids who were much more active collectors in the summer. So, besides no evidence that this happened, it goes against all common sense.

rats60 08-26-2016 07:53 AM

One final point, during the height of the card boom in the 1980s, it was common for card companies to push out their new sets before Christmas to capture extra sales. So, for example 1985 Donruss was actually released in December of 1984, the cards contain stats from the 1984 season and no one considers them a 1984 set.

calvindog 09-01-2016 12:54 PM

Sold!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:25 PM.