Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Kershaw Signed Ball (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=223795)

stu060283 06-10-2016 07:12 PM

Kershaw Signed Ball
 
1 Attachment(s)
I've seen this Kershaw ball for sale locally with a good price. It says it has a certificate with it, but by following you guys I i know that means nothing. I've done some comparisons and think it looks good. Do you guys have any opinions on it?

mighty bombjack 06-10-2016 09:07 PM

That looks VERY slowly drawn to me. I wouldn't touch it, personally.

frankbmd 06-10-2016 09:29 PM

Is his middle name "4"?

mattjc1983 06-10-2016 09:48 PM

Usually the Steiner certificate (that's what it looks like in the picture) is a good sign...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

stu060283 06-11-2016 12:20 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by frankbmd (Post 1549153)
Is his middle name "4"?

Well if you look at the 3 balls from MLB and Fanatics then I would say his middle name is 4!!

thetruthisoutthere 06-11-2016 06:56 AM

That's what a call "A disaster of a signature."

My goodness!!!!!

jimjim 06-11-2016 02:07 PM

Does it have the Steiner hologram sticker on it?

sbfinley 06-11-2016 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere (Post 1549192)
That's what a call "A disaster of a signature."

My goodness!!!!!

I enjoy his signature and think it's unique, but I can see how some may not. I think it should also be noted how great he is to the hobby. If you made a list of the top 10 elite players in the game he would absolutely be on it. He would also be the only one who is still a near 100% lock TTM. He responds to all of his mail over the Christmas holiday and is great in person.

Steve D 06-11-2016 06:06 PM

I finally figured out after looking at his Topps RC, that the 4 is actually a combination of the "ton" in Clayton, and the first stroke of the "K" in his last name.

Otherwise, I've always thought his autograph looks like "C94U_"

Regarding the OP's question, I don't really like the signature. The "U" at the end is crooked (diagonal). In every authentic signature I've seen (except very early ones), the "U" is verticle (as in the pictures in stu060283's post), and has a more pointy bottom, as opposed to the square bottom in the OP.

Actually, in looking again at a 2008 Topps Kershaw RC, it looks like someone tried to copy the facsimile autograph on the card.

Steve

stu060283 06-12-2016 12:06 AM

Appreciate all the replies. Think I'll leave it then

djson1 06-14-2016 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stu060283 (Post 1549095)
I've seen this Kershaw ball for sale locally with a good price. It says it has a certificate with it, but by following you guys I i know that means nothing. I've done some comparisons and think it looks good. Do you guys have any opinions on it?

I wouldn't say the certificate means nothing. As another person mentioned, if it has the Steiner hologram and cert card, I'd lean towards authentic. Plus, I have a signed Kershaw ball with the MLB hologram on it and it looks very close to this.

Ryan1125 06-15-2016 09:49 AM

This is authentic IMO. Earlier sweet spot Kersh sigs for Steiner look just like this. Slow, large, and ugly, but authentic.

He signs "Clt K-", it usually looks like CL 44


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:50 PM.