|  | 
| 
 Wtb 1955 topps hocus focus kid gavilan I want to buy a 1955 Topps HOCUS FOCUS KID GAVILAN card. It's in the sports thrills section, card # 19 of 20. I prefer a card with good exposure. Can anyone help me find one? Thanks, Sam Majors | 
| 
 1955 I am just a baseball collector, but have found the baseball subset of the 1955 Hocus Focus set to be the hardest of all the actually issued Topps sets to complete. I have 21 of the 23. It has only been in the last few years that the baseball checklist was fully known. I have finished the 1948 Magic Photo and 1956 Hocus Focus baseball subsets, but not sure I will be able to finish the 55 What is your experience on the boxing side ? | 
| 
 Tremendously rare set.  Very few examples are known.  I've handled a few Moores and Marcianos but have seen only one Gavilan.   http://photos.imageevent.com/exhibit...%20Gavilan.jpg It currently resides in a PSA 2 holder. Pop 1. SGC pop is 0. | 
| 
 kid gavilan i recently sold the gavilan to someone on this board...hmmmm | 
| 
 Yep. Guilty as charged.   I think it finished my master set of HF boxing. As I understand it, the smaller sized cards, the singles, were # 1-126, while the larger cards with the perforated edges were #1-96. The Gavilan (116) and Moore (121) would be only available in the small versions, while Marciano (54) would be in both versions. Here is what it would look like [sorry for the crappy scans]: http://photos.imageevent.com/exhibit...ster%20Set.jpg Who is Gavilan knocking the snot out of on the card? | 
| 
 gavilan if i knew it finished your master set i would have really jacked up the price...lol | 
| 
 Quote: 
 Looks like Ralph Tiger Jones. | 
| 
 On the Archie Moore, hard to tell from the exposure, but I would guess Harold Johnson is the opponent. | 
| 
 1955 The 48 Magic Photos seem relatively "easy" to find. The 56s were not easy but the 55s seem much harder. Any theories on why that would be ? | 
| 
 Kid Gavilan AL, I believe the boxing cards are much tougher than the baseball in the Hocus Focus sets. I have been looking for the boxers for 20 - 25 years. I've had 4 of the Marciano cards and 2 or 3 Archie Moore cards. It was on this board that I found out about the Gavilan card. It had been sold (to Adam?) before I asked about it. I'm interested if another shows up!! Thanks, Sam Majors | 
| 
 Al, David Hornish would be the person to ask.   Sam, my set may well end up in a LOTG auction some time in the not too distant future. Depends on which colleges my kid gets into. | 
| 
 Quote: 
 If you need a home for that Young Perez let me know. | 
| 
 Hey, Leon's not the only one who is willing to take one for the team... | 
| 
 Quote: 
 I've got approximately 17 years of collecting left in me until my first turns 18. I don't even want to imagine what college tuition will be then. | 
| 
 Maybe Sanders will win and it will all be free. Then everyone of us can just spend as much money as we want on old pieces of cardboard! | 
| 
 Let's leave the politics out of this.  You want to spout off about that subject, go to another board.   Oh, and FYI, under the reign of that well-known left-wing pinko commie socialist, governor Ronald Reagan, the University of California offered free tuition to state residents. | 
| 
 Hocus Focus Speaking of those two guys, anyone have the Roosevelt World Leader card :) As for 55, I do not think the baseball subset is any easier. It was not until a couple of years ago Bob Lemke was even able to complete the baseball checklist, and I have still never seen the two I am looking for. Anyone know anyone who has done the entire set ? I have an unopened 56 pack, has anyone seen a 55 pack ? I will take your suggestion Adam and ask Dave. He is sure a great resource, especially for Topps | 
| 
 Adam, point taken about leaving politics off this well-manicured board. Just to be clear though, the whole Sanders bit was tongue-in-cheek. Like Alan, I've got my own newborn. Im currently going through the first phases of seeing my discretionary income dry up like a desert oasis. | 
| 
 Darn, and I had just logged on to start a rousing discussion about whether or not Obama should get to nominate someone to replace Scalia. Kidding. This tread is giving me the itch to start collecting the self-developing boxing cards. Because then it would be a slippery slope and I would have to buy more of the 1959 hokus pokus cards (with three different back types) and it would all snowball from there. | 
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:12 PM. |