Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   PLEASE EXPLAIN--t206 Baker PSA 6 for over $6000 (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=213830)

forazzurri2axz 11-08-2015 06:00 PM

PLEASE EXPLAIN--t206 Baker PSA 6 for over $6000
 
????????????????and there were 3 people bidding over $5,000 on ebay earlier

what am I missing?? sweet cap back is no rarity either!

Leon 11-08-2015 06:35 PM

I moved this from the BST section for T206s. It's probably better to discuss it here. thanks

mechanicalman 11-08-2015 07:01 PM

Same dude who bought the Cobb for $16k. Apparently, unlimited funds and little regard for market pricing. But good news for holders of mid-grade Bakers, I guess.

pkaufman 11-08-2015 07:03 PM

Leon right on top of the situation as usual...does he ever sleep ?

Peter_Spaeth 11-08-2015 07:09 PM

Smash that record in style!!

Latest Auction Prices for: PSA 6 - Average Price: $986.51





11/8/15 eBay Auction | Image pwcc_auctions g***c 55 $6,200.00
3/8/15 eBay Image pwcc_auctions i***b 25 $986.51
10/16/14 eBay Image www.stevenovella.com o***c 21 $806.00
7/21/14 eBay Image smlefty r***r 1 $750.00
5/19/14 eBay Image probstein123 s***s 21 $898.00

1952boyntoncollector 11-08-2015 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1470363)
Smash that record in style!!

Latest Auction Prices for: PSA 6 - Average Price: $986.51





11/8/15 eBay Auction | Image pwcc_auctions g***c 55 $6,200.00
3/8/15 eBay Image pwcc_auctions i***b 25 $986.51
10/16/14 eBay Image www.stevenovella.com o***c 21 $806.00
7/21/14 eBay Image smlefty r***r 1 $750.00
5/19/14 eBay Image probstein123 s***s 21 $898.00

who the heck the underbidders there....now im questioning if that is legit...

pkaufman 11-08-2015 07:12 PM

My friends, Leon is UBIQUITOUS ! Look it up !

Peter_Spaeth 11-08-2015 07:14 PM

BidderClick here to know more about anonymous user IDs

Bid Amount

Bid Time



Member Id: g***c( 775Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $6,200.00
Nov-08-15 14:08:02 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $6,100.00
Nov-08-15 14:08:40 PST

Member Id: g***c( 775Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $6,000.00
Nov-08-15 14:05:57 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $6,000.00
Nov-08-15 14:08:35 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $5,800.00
Nov-08-15 14:08:29 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $5,600.00
Nov-08-15 14:08:23 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $5,400.00
Nov-08-15 14:08:18 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $5,200.00
Nov-08-15 14:08:13 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $5,000.00
Nov-08-15 14:08:10 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $4,900.00
Nov-08-15 14:08:06 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $4,750.00
Nov-08-15 14:07:55 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $4,600.00
Nov-08-15 14:07:52 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $4,450.00
Nov-08-15 14:07:31 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $4,300.00
Nov-08-15 14:07:08 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $4,150.00
Nov-08-15 14:07:04 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $4,000.00
Nov-08-15 14:06:52 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $3,850.00
Nov-08-15 14:06:43 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $3,700.00
Nov-08-15 14:06:39 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $3,600.00
Nov-08-15 14:06:35 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $3,500.00
Nov-08-15 14:06:31 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $3,400.00
Nov-08-15 14:06:27 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $3,200.00
Nov-08-15 14:06:23 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $3,000.00
Nov-08-15 14:05:28 PST

Member Id: g***c( 775Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $2,800.00
Nov-08-15 13:16:04 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $2,700.00
Nov-08-15 14:05:24 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $2,500.00
Nov-08-15 14:05:20 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $2,400.00
Nov-08-15 14:05:16 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $2,300.00
Nov-08-15 14:05:12 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $2,000.00
Nov-08-15 14:05:07 PST

Member Id: g***c( 775Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $1,700.00
Nov-08-15 12:26:20 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $1,700.00
Nov-08-15 14:05:02 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $1,500.00
Nov-08-15 14:04:55 PST

Member Id: g***c( 775Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $1,250.00
Nov-08-15 12:26:13 PST

Member Id: l***i( 736Feedback score is 500 to 999) US $1,200.00
Nov-08-15 14:04:44 PST

Leon 11-08-2015 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pkaufman (Post 1470365)
My friends, Leon is UBIQUITOUS ! Look it up !

I am barely anywhere.....trust me. I see things in the wrong places sometimes and move them, that's all. I have to earn my keep somehow.

pkaufman 11-08-2015 07:22 PM

Leon.....love ya !

pokerplyr80 11-08-2015 07:25 PM

So what's the thought on this one? That two guys are trying to manipulate the market for t206 Bakers? Or high grade t206s in general? I'm having trouble thinking of a legitimate reason to bid this card up to even 3k, let alone 6k.

PolarBear 11-08-2015 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pkaufman (Post 1470358)
Leon right on top of the situation as usual...does he ever sleep ?

He does not.

http://vignette4.wikia.nocookie.net/...20140427122513

asphaltman 11-08-2015 07:28 PM

Ebay hiding identities years ago made all of this worse.

Peter_Spaeth 11-08-2015 07:40 PM

Same exact card sold a year ago, for 806. Good return on investment.

Bored5000 11-08-2015 07:44 PM

Obviously nothing sketchy at all about the 18 bid retractions in the past six months and 86 percent bid activity with PWCC by the winning bidder. ;)

Peter_Spaeth 11-08-2015 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 (Post 1470373)
So what's the thought on this one? That two guys are trying to manipulate the market for t206 Bakers? Or high grade t206s in general? I'm having trouble thinking of a legitimate reason to bid this card up to even 3k, let alone 6k.

The T206 Baker is the new 52T Mantle. They don't call him Home Run for nothing.

pkaufman 11-08-2015 07:47 PM

Amen !

pokerplyr80 11-08-2015 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1470382)
The T206 Baker is the new 52T Mantle. They don't call him Home Run for nothing.

It looks like at least a couple of people agree with you. At that price it didn't sell for much less than a 51 Bowman Mantle in the same grade would go for.

calvindog 11-08-2015 08:51 PM

PWCC is clean...everyone know it...wait maybe not clean....can't decide...

1952boyntoncollector 11-08-2015 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 1470412)
PWCC is clean...everyone know it...wait maybe not clean....can't decide...

I don't think we are worried about auctions that go for 5x the last sale amount..this is obvious a weird situation but I pretty sure no one on this forum will be bidding $2k on the same type of card in the future

pokerplyr80 11-08-2015 09:26 PM

I doubt PWCC had anything to do with this one. With the other auctions he had ending today I would be surprised if he was even paying much attention to the Baker other than noting what it closed at.

Brent Huigens 11-09-2015 01:50 PM

PWCC Response
 
Just wanted to quickly touch base on this thread.

This was absolutely one of the stranger results last night. The high bidder placed a virtually infinite high bid to ensure victory and then saw the bid run up to the staggering closing price, which is multiples above what was expected for the card.

The bid history looks very concerning with the under bidder driving the price incrementally as they did. Upon first glance it looks like a clear cut case of manipulation but then as the auction progressed the under bidder in question managed to win additional items using a similar bidding practice. These items have all been paid for as of this morning.

Even still,, we may cancel the auction and relist if the high bidder is uncomfortable with the circumstances.

Brent Huigens
PWCC Auctions

SMPEP 11-09-2015 03:53 PM

I don't get that. You say the underbidder is legit. So why cancel the auction? There were two legitimate bidders. They both put in their bids. Highest one wins.

That the amount doesn't make sense to most of us is not a reason to cancel a fair auction.

Just my 2 cents.
Patrick

Joshchisox08 11-09-2015 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mechanicalman (Post 1470356)
Same dude who bought the Cobb for $16k. Apparently, unlimited funds and little regard for market pricing. But good news for holders of mid-grade Bakers, I guess.

Must be nice :mad:

Sean 11-09-2015 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SMPEP (Post 1470636)
I don't get that. You say the underbidder is legit. So why cancel the auction? There were two legitimate bidders. They both put in their bids. Highest one wins.

That the amount doesn't make sense to most of us is not a reason to cancel a fair auction.

Just my 2 cents.
Patrick

+1 If a buyer posts a virtually infinite bid, he should anticipate such a result. :rolleyes:

Joshchisox08 11-09-2015 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brent Huigens (Post 1470569)
Just wanted to quickly touch base on this thread.

This was absolutely one of the stranger results last night. The high bidder placed a virtually infinite high bid to ensure victory and then saw the bid run up to the staggering closing price, which is multiples above what was expected for the card.

The bid history looks very concerning with the under bidder driving the price incrementally as they did. Upon first glance it looks like a clear cut case of manipulation but then as the auction progressed the under bidder in question managed to win additional items using a similar bidding practice. These items have all been paid for as of this morning.

Even still,, we may cancel the auction and relist if the high bidder is uncomfortable with the circumstances.

Brent Huigens
PWCC Auctions

Perhaps you gave them (the cosigner) the infinite amount. Then the "under bidder" drove up the price that way ???

I think you need a time-out :rolleyes:

16 total posts by this guy and he happens to come around and post on this subject. Yeah I'll buy that for a dollar.

Leon 11-09-2015 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshchisox08 (Post 1470640)
Perhaps you gave them (the cosigner) the infinite amount. Then the "under bidder" drove up the price that way ???

I think you need a time-out :rolleyes:

16 total posts by this guy and he happens to come around and post on this subject. Yeah I'll buy that for a dollar.

You might save that dollar to buy a clue.

irishdenny 11-09-2015 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshchisox08 (Post 1470640)
Perhaps you gave them (the cosigner) the infinite amount. Then the "under bidder" drove up the price that way ???

I think you need a time-out :rolleyes:

16 total posts by this guy and he happens to come around and post on this subject. Yeah I'll buy that for a dollar.

"Just iN Case ya MiSS'd it!?"

HE "iS" PWCC...

Leon 11-09-2015 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irishdenny (Post 1470647)
"Just iN Case ya MiSS'd it!?"

HE "iS" PWCC...

Same guy that was insinuating, if not accusing, me of bad stuff too. I say we should always consider the source. When an idiot says something many times it is idiotic.

pokerplyr80 11-09-2015 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joshchisox08 (Post 1470640)
Perhaps you gave them (the cosigner) the infinite amount. Then the "under bidder" drove up the price that way ???

I think you need a time-out :rolleyes:

16 total posts by this guy and he happens to come around and post on this subject. Yeah I'll buy that for a dollar.

Why is his number of total posts relevant? He gave you his explanation of what happened. Believe him or don't, that's up to you. If nothing else I think it's nice he actually goes on forums to address controversial issues. I don't think an Auction House owner should be posting more than once in a while on a forum designed for collectors.

Jeff_cvc 11-09-2015 05:05 PM

Thanks
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Brent Huigens (Post 1470569)
Just wanted to quickly touch base on this thread.

This was absolutely one of the stranger results last night. The high bidder placed a virtually infinite high bid to ensure victory and then saw the bid run up to the staggering closing price, which is multiples above what was expected for the card.

The bid history looks very concerning with the under bidder driving the price incrementally as they did. Upon first glance it looks like a clear cut case of manipulation but then as the auction progressed the under bidder in question managed to win additional items using a similar bidding practice. These items have all been paid for as of this morning.

Even still,, we may cancel the auction and relist if the high bidder is uncomfortable with the circumstances.

Brent Huigens
PWCC Auctions

Brent,
Thank you for posting and addressing this thread. I can appreciate when an AH takes the time to address an issue in this forum, especially in a non-combative manner. It shows me that they care about their reputation and their customer (which are many on Net54).

I was very excited to win a card in the latest PWCC auction. I thought it went for an appropriate amount, especially considering I got it a little under my max bid. This is the third time I've won an auction from PWCC and the service has always been top notch. They immediately give me positive feedback upon payment, the card is shipped the following day and packaged securely. Lastly, I appreciate them advertising on Net54 which helps keep this forum relevant and thriving.

Thanks,
Jeff Rogoff


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:59 PM.