Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   1916 M101 Ruth rookie (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=213276)

ls7plus 10-27-2015 09:20 PM

1916 M101 Ruth rookie
 
What happened during the printing process to cause some of the examples of this card--but not others--to display what might be termed a "white rod" exiting from the Babe's left thigh? Something on the plate, which was subsequently removed? Or defective plate in this respect, and another subsequently made to correct the flaw?

Just curious if there are any answers out there about something I've always wondered about,

Larry

Leon 10-29-2015 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ls7plus (Post 1465855)
What happened during the printing process to cause some of the examples of this card--but not others--to display what might be termed a "white rod" exiting from the Babe's left thigh? Something on the plate, which was subsequently removed? Or defective plate in this respect, and another subsequently made to correct the flaw?

Just curious if there are any answers out there about something I've always wondered about,

Larry

I think it was something on the printing plate or in the printing process itself (kind of stating the obvious)....That line bugs me a little bit and I don't think it's as pronounced on some copies.

nolemmings 10-29-2015 11:18 AM

Yes it would appear that something went amiss in the printing process. However, the Ruths displaying this trait are in the minority. It also seems to me that this flaw is found only in the m101-5 versions. Although Ruth bears the same card number in both sets and looks for all intents and purposes identical, I believe I have seen the print line only on blank back and Famous & Barr cards-- none with backs that are exclusive to m101-4. I never gave it a whole lot of thought however.

ls7plus 10-29-2015 05:57 PM

Thank you, gentlemen, for taking the time to express your thoughts. Very interesting.

Larry

Peter_Spaeth 10-29-2015 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nolemmings (Post 1466412)
Yes it would appear that something went amiss in the printing process. However, the Ruths displaying this trait are in the minority. It also seems to me that this flaw is found only in the m101-5 versions. Although Ruth bears the same card number in both sets and looks for all intents and purposes identical, I believe I have seen the print line only on blank back and Famous & Barr cards-- none with backs that are exclusive to m101-4. I never gave it a whole lot of thought however.

You never gave anything a whole lot of thought. :eek:

nolemmings 10-29-2015 07:24 PM

Hey, I can't give what I don't have.

ls7plus 10-30-2015 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth (Post 1466602)
You never gave anything a whole lot of thought. :eek:

Pete, I think you have more fun here than any other board member!

Always enjoy your posts,

Larry


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:55 PM.