![]() |
Scanning Raw T201
1 Attachment(s)
What is the best way to scan a raw T201? I have almost 20 that I want to put up on the BST(shameless self-promotion). So far my efforts have produced less than stellar results due to the "fold" of the Double Fold. It creates the illusion that the card is mis-cut. I even borrowed Leon's quarter and placed it on the card to flatten it out.:D This is the result. (This Kling/Cole came out of an SGC 40 holder as a result of a Postal mishap. It is perfectly square.). Perhaps a bigger coin? Or is this twist accepted as a known issue when dealing with T201?
Attachment 203107 |
That scan is fine. Collectors of T201 know the cuts look misleading. They were cut like that from the factory. I have been fooled before thinking one was crazily miscut. But when I folded it over it was a perfect cut. The illusion is it was very trimmed. It wasn't. That scan is fine. Do scans of fronts and backs and good luck....LL
|
Thanks Leon......
|
What Leon said!
I've owned a few. Scan looks great, especially for T201. Personally, I stink at scanning and grading my own raw cards, again, especially those Meccas - they are a scoptical delusion. Fugetaboutit! I ended up consigning mine to B&L a while back (Hi Scott and Leon). |
Quote:
|
Damage control
[QUOTE=Bocabirdman;1448454] (This Kling/Cole came out of an SGC 40 holder as a result of a Postal mishap. It is perfectly square.). [QUOTE]
Mike is being kind...I sold him this card, and because I addressed it incorrectly, it made 3 cross-country trips. That is way too many postal miles to expect it to arrive without damage. I think T201 collectors are fairly knowlegable about the angle illusion and accept actual miscuts as well, as long as they are not too pronounced. Brian |
[QUOTE=brianp-beme;1448562][QUOTE=Bocabirdman;1448454] (This Kling/Cole came out of an SGC 40 holder as a result of a Postal mishap. It is perfectly square.).
Quote:
Z |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:08 PM. |