![]() |
GAI 52 Mantle
This one is out of my league regardless, but what do you think are the odds this would cross to a PSA 7, or even a PSA 6? What about the odds the card is altered? 74k is a big gamble.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1952-TOPPS-3...16.m2518.l4276 |
Quote:
Something here tells me, that maybe PSA claimed it to be 'AUTH", altered or trimmed and therefore could not receive a numerical grade??? This is where holding in person is needed, maybe a blacklight too to see if any doctoring was done. |
I didn't scroll down to see that question. Unless you just asked it. But that sounds about right. I wonder if that means he already spent $500 trying to cross it. Maybe he put in a minimum grade of 7 on the sheet. I know they usually don't tell you why it didn't meet the grade you requested or what it would have received.
Considering a GAI 8 sold for 30k less than a year ago I think 75k is a little high for a 7, even considering the increase in value since then. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If I am the seller, regardless of whether I like PSA grading, the money spent getting the card graded with PSA will more than make up the grading expense of $500. I would expect a PSA 6 to out sell a GAI 7 any day, especially a 52 Mantle. Since the seller seems to be caught up in the grade, they should cross over to BCCG or PRO and they will probably get a 10.
|
52 Mantle
My big issue with a GAI grade would be to have it come back as trimmed. That would hurt.
z |
The top border looks off to me
|
Quote:
I think buying today you would expect at least 3 grades lower for psa versus gai....and worry about not getting it graded...anyone trying to sell a card for 1000s obviously looked at the PSA route and there was a problem... |
Quote:
|
The fact that this card is in the worst possible 3rd party grading companies holder possible should speak volumes. (I'm being facetious - but GAI is pretty piss poor).
|
Quote:
that's a beautiful card, no doubt, but unfortunately it's simply a high dollar psa/sgc "A" |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 AM. |