Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   T206 / Old Judge pack question (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=206981)

cozmokramer 06-06-2015 07:18 AM

T206 / Old Judge pack question
 
I know there are a bunch of GAI packs that are labeled T206, or 1909-11, or 1909-19...

Are there any ENCAPSULATED packs floating around or that someone has pictures of that are labeled from the Old Judge era/series?

Leon 06-07-2015 06:32 AM

I believe I have seen one or a few encapsulated but am not positive. If there are any they will definitely be rare, especially if unopened.

felada 06-07-2015 07:18 AM

I believe there is a graded OJ floating around with the pulled from pack designation on the flip

Joe_G. 06-07-2015 07:43 AM

1 Attachment(s)
I save digital copies of most Goodwin & Co. packs that come to auction / for sale. This was from an April 2004 Mile High auction. Tax stamp on this pack was from September 1887.

Jeffrompa 06-07-2015 12:07 PM

Further examination.
 
I guess we would all love to check that pack out a little closer .

oldjudge 06-07-2015 12:28 PM

To find an unopened pack is pretty rare. Leon is right, Alan Rosen had a pack that was found in the mid-1990s that was unopened. It was opened at a show and had a rare card inside(Alcott-Mansfields). The card was heavily tobacco stained on the back, but SGC unexplainably gave it an SGC96 grade, I believe. The pack contained an N173 redemption list and an Goodwin & Co coupon, in addition to the card.
Opened Old Judge packs are not that scarce. The slabbed one that Joe has posted a picture of was an opened pack.

jp1216 06-07-2015 12:32 PM

SGC POP report shows a 98! with the next highest being a 60. :eek:

cozmokramer 06-07-2015 01:13 PM

Thanks everyone, especially Joe for that pic!

I'd love to find one exactly like that to purchase!

swarmee 06-07-2015 01:31 PM

The pack in the picture does say "(EMPTY)", in case you didn't notice.

z28jd 06-07-2015 01:39 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by jp1216 (Post 1418982)
SGC POP report shows a 98! with the next highest being a 60. :eek:

It was a 98 and sold for close to $10,000 I believe, at least that was the asking price. I have a nice Mansfield card, would probably grade close to a 60, if not a grade higher, but I have no plans of grading it. The white marks on the scans aren't on the card, except the the one on the right border(middle) and the back is clean.

Joe_G. 06-07-2015 01:46 PM

Here is a better image of the pack I posted (easier to see "EMPTY").

http://www.net54baseball.com/picture...ictureid=18527

I'm not aware of any remaining unopened OJ packs that may contain a baseball card (1886-1890).

cozmokramer 06-07-2015 08:03 PM

Joe - is this your pack?

Joe_G. 06-07-2015 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cozmokramer (Post 1419123)
Joe - is this your pack?

Nope, not sure where this pack now resides and whether it is still encapsulated. I do have a nice empty example in my collection from 1888 (w/ baseball notice stamp on side).

MW1 06-07-2015 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldjudge (Post 1418981)
To find an unopened pack is pretty rare. Leon is right, Alan Rosen had a pack that was found in the mid-1990s that was unopened. It was opened at a show and had a rare card inside(Alcott-Mansfields). The card was heavily tobacco stained on the back, but SGC unexplainably gave it an SGC96 grade, I believe. The pack contained an N173 redemption list and an Goodwin & Co coupon, in addition to the card.
Opened Old Judge packs are not that scarce. The slabbed one that Joe has posted a picture of was an opened pack.

The N172 Alcott was graded a 98 by SGC but it was the old label...before Derek and Lee were the principal graders.

I don't have a scan of the back of the card but I don't recall it being heavily stained. Moderately might be a better word. The corners were pretty sharp. It sold in August of 2002 for $6910. I don't have a record of any sales after that. All things considered, a pretty rare card in that grade.

http://www.bmwcards.net/net54/1887alcott.jpg

cozmokramer 06-08-2015 12:05 AM

Yes I'm familiar with that card. So what's your asking price?

cozmokramer 06-08-2015 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe_G. (Post 1419141)
Nope, not sure where this pack now resides and whether it is still encapsulated. I do have a nice empty example in my collection from 1888 (w/ baseball notice stamp on side).


Joe, I'm assuming this one is NOT encapsulated I take it.

MW1 06-08-2015 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cozmokramer (Post 1419167)
Yes I'm familiar with that card. So what's your asking price?

I'm not the owner.

1880nonsports 06-08-2015 08:06 AM

hold it!
 
Joe
what is a baseball notice stamp?!>?<:?

Leon 06-08-2015 08:25 AM

If I remember correctly that card has one small circular type stain on the back. I don't think you can get a more clear image on a card. It is gorgeous, thanks for posting it MW....

Quote:

Originally Posted by MW1 (Post 1419158)
The N172 Alcott was graded a 98 by SGC but it was the old label...before Derek and Lee were the principal graders.

I don't have a scan of the back of the card but I don't recall it being heavily stained. Moderately might be a better word. The corners were pretty sharp. It sold in August of 2002 for $6910. I don't have a record of any sales after that. All things considered, a pretty rare card in that grade.

http://www.bmwcards.net/net54/1887alcott.jpg


oldjudge 06-08-2015 11:48 AM

The whole back of the card was brown from sitting close to cigarettes for over 100 years. I am very familiar with the card.

Leon 06-08-2015 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldjudge (Post 1419261)
The whole back of the card was brown from sitting close to cigarettes for over 100 years. I am very familiar with the card.

Thanks Jay...I must have been thinking about a different card.

packs 06-08-2015 12:56 PM

The designation on that flip has always bothered me. Every N172 was taken from a pack. Seems superfluous.

kkkkandp 06-08-2015 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by packs (Post 1419278)
The designation on that flip has always bothered me. Every N172 was taken from a pack. Seems superfluous.

It would make more sense in context, as in stating the year in which it was removed.

That having been said, I don't think that makes said card any more valuable. It's just an interesting footnote.

Joe_G. 06-08-2015 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cozmokramer (Post 1419168)
Joe, I'm assuming this one is NOT encapsulated I take it.

Eric, my pack is empty and not encapsulated.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1880nonsports (Post 1419216)
Joe
what is a baseball notice stamp?!>?<:?

Henry, I was pretty careless in my response :rolleyes:. It isn't a stamp but instead a label on side of pack as shown below (not mine, this is the pack pictured in the OJ book). I'm only aware of three packs with this label; at least two of them date to 1888, not sure about 3rd. The "baseball notice" likely refers to the cabinet photograph list of players enclosed in the pack (with details on how to redeem said cabinet). May also refer to the "slip" that both the checklist and the many surviving metamorphic trade cards reference but I've yet to see an 1888 "slip/certificate/coupon".


1880nonsports 06-09-2015 10:02 AM

tx for responding
 
had not seen that. That's a fantastic pack - the base ball reference makes it almost as good as a ghost T206 ;) Seriously though I can only think of one attribution that's more specific to the base ball theme - the strip found on the Yum Yum cans. Kind of pack I'd love to come across within reason as "variations" are becoming difficult for me to justify - but for a pack like that I could give up a couple of mine. I have a small collection of non-sport card packs with strips and such.
That said - a metamorphic would have to fit in the pack. Perhaps it's the "not newspaper" list of players/cabinets? My knowledge relative to Goodwin other than advertising, banners, and albums is at best inadequate. I am ashamedly admitting I only glanced over the OJ book when I first bought it. Please don't be insulted. I have but one OJ BB card and I no longer go to shows so little opportunity to buy/sell them. At the time reading the book fell off my radar and since then I've had other priorities to address. It's silly though for me not to have read it as I'm still quite interested in ALL history related to the 1880's manufacturers - I'll start to tackle it this week all things remaining as they are now.
As an aside Joe - I have located a box with much of my paper non-banner OJ stuff. I will see if I have any coupons left that might be different than yours - and rest assured - your newsboy still safe with me :-)

1880nonsports 06-09-2015 10:12 AM

I would suggest
 
having the card and pack together along with the proper provenance would elevate the value of the pack above that of a similar opened pack. As for the card - probably not - but likely because of the extraordinary condition of the card. A significantly lesser condition card would benefit the most. There's always someone who wants something a little more special than the other guy and a card actually associated with a pack is about the best one can do to corroborate that inserts were just that.
Of course - getting an N172 AND one that secured a grade and price as it did - was extremely lucky - there were many other scenarios and most often the greatest value is in the unopened pack - one sells the sizzle and not the steak......

oldjudge 06-09-2015 01:57 PM

1 Attachment(s)
Henry--Here is an image


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:27 AM.