Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Sweet Carporal variation? (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=206856)

xplainer 06-03-2015 04:13 PM

Sweet Carporal variation?
 
Got in some new cards today, and I noted the SC looked different from my other two (yeah only two, just started this venture).

Anyway, the one I already had seems to be missing the "shadow" behind the letters and the inside border.

If this has been discussed before, I apologize. Just direct me to that thread.

Looking for information from the veteran collectors.

Here are the two cards:

http://i326.photobucket.com/albums/k...ps0psa2zd1.jpg

swarmee 06-03-2015 04:53 PM

The shadow effect is there, just very faint. Look at the ETTE of Cigarettes. But yes, most of the red ink is missing. It was not intentional, since they would have erased all of it or if it was before the shadow effect, none would be visible. Nice catch.

Eric72 06-03-2015 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xplainer (Post 1417725)
Got in some new cards today, and I noted the SC looked different from my other two (yeah only two, just started this venture).

Anyway, the one I already had seems to be missing the "shadow" behind the letters and the inside border.

If this has been discussed before, I apologize. Just direct me to that thread.

Looking for information from the veteran collectors.

Here are the two cards:

http://i326.photobucket.com/albums/k...ps0psa2zd1.jpg

Please show the fronts of the two cards, if you would be so kind.

Best regards,

Eric

swarmee 06-03-2015 06:00 PM

I think the fronts were withheld intentionally to allow time for the OP to find more, if it is actually a print variation. I would more side with lack of ink on the printing plate, or bad soaking that erased some of the lighter red portions. Does the front of the right one have color loss on the front?

xplainer 06-03-2015 07:03 PM

No, not intentional. I didn't think about posting the fronts, as the backs were in question. I'll post them again, front and back, in the morning, as I have some life issues to deal with tonight. Stay tuned.

-Jimmy

xplainer 06-03-2015 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by swarmee (Post 1417747)
The shadow effect is there, just very faint. Look at the ETTE of Cigarettes. But yes, most of the red ink is missing. It was not intentional, since they would have erased all of it or if it was before the shadow effect, none would be visible. Nice catch.

Yeah, I see that now. Around the "r" it is more clear. But the inside borders are still missing the red. As requested, I'll post front and backs in the early morning.
Got to go tonight.
-Jimmy

xplainer 06-04-2015 03:27 AM

Here is a scan of the fronts.
Delehanty is the one in question.

http://i326.photobucket.com/albums/k...psqxvyouyg.jpg

sreader3 06-04-2015 05:57 PM

Hi Jimmy,

Cool card and great observation. Wish I had something to add, but without more study I tend to agree that it is probably a matter of degree (less ink) rather than kind (no ink) and is a print error (akin to the "filled leaf" card in my earlier thread).

Scot

xplainer 06-04-2015 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sreader3 (Post 1418072)
Hi Jimmy,

Cool card and great observation. Wish I had something to add, but without more study I tend to agree that it is probably a matter of degree (less ink) rather than kind (no ink) and is a print error (akin to the "filled leaf" card in my earlier thread).

Scot

Thanks for the input everyone. Just another wrinkle in the Monster. Man, I am so glad I ran into this set. After years of "collecting" baseball cards, I now am truly collecting baseball cards. :D

So much can be learned on this site. And I have learned a lot in the time here.

Yeah Scot, I read your thread about "filled leaf" cards. I just saw this and thought I'd throw it out on the forum for discussion.

Thanks folks.

-Jimmy


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:35 PM.